Call existsProviderTxConflict after CheckSpecialTx#2690
Merged
Conversation
Otherwise we might end up passing and invalid proTx into it, causing assertions to fail and thus crash the process.
codablock
added a commit
to codablock/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2019
Otherwise we might end up passing and invalid proTx into it, causing assertions to fail and thus crash the process.
CryptoCentric
pushed a commit
to absolute-community/absolute
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 29, 2020
Otherwise we might end up passing and invalid proTx into it, causing assertions to fail and thus crash the process.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Otherwise we might end up passing and invalid proTx into it, causing
assertions to fail and thus crash the process.
This should also be backported to v13.