This would help to clean up the gen.TimeoutError issue partially fixed in #3394 . It would also be on the way to standardizing us on asyncio.
It appears that they don't support timeout= keywords, so we'll have to use asyncio.wait_for or something similar.
cc @jrbourbeau @jcrist
This would help to clean up the gen.TimeoutError issue partially fixed in #3394 . It would also be on the way to standardizing us on asyncio.
It appears that they don't support
timeout=keywords, so we'll have to useasyncio.wait_foror something similar.cc @jrbourbeau @jcrist