Fix terminology: Replace 'inline' with 'in-table' storage#109
Closed
dimitri-yatsenko wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Fix terminology: Replace 'inline' with 'in-table' storage#109dimitri-yatsenko wants to merge 2 commits into
dimitri-yatsenko wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
- Fixed llms.txt manual reference from migrate-from-0x to migrate-to-v20 - Regenerated llms-full.txt to pick up all corrected migration guide links from PR #107 - Verified no remaining broken internal links in LLM documentation files
…erminology Fixed terminology inconsistency identified in cohesion review: - TERMINOLOGY.md explicitly deprecates 'inline storage' → 'in-table' - Updated all documentation to use canonical terminology Files changed: - how-to/use-object-storage.md: inline → in-table (3 occurrences) - reference/specs/type-system.md: inline → in-table (3 occurrences) - reference/specs/codec-api.md: inline → in-table (2 occurrences) - reference/specs/npy-codec.md: inline → in-table (1 occurrence) - explanation/whats-new-2.md: inline attachment → in-table attachment - llms-full.txt: regenerated to pick up all fixes Verified: No deprecated inline storage terminology remains in markdown files. Fixes: COHESION-REVIEW.md Issue #1 (High Priority)
This was referenced Jan 14, 2026
Member
Author
|
Consolidated into #119 - Documentation Cohesion Review: Comprehensive Improvements for DataJoint 2.0 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes terminology inconsistency identified in comprehensive cohesion review (COHESION-REVIEW.md Issue #1).
Problem
TERMINOLOGY.md explicitly deprecates "inline storage" → "in-table storage", but several documentation files still used the old term, undermining the authoritative terminology reference.
Changes
Replaced all occurrences of deprecated storage terminology:
Files Changed
✅
how-to/use-object-storage.md:✅
reference/specs/type-system.md:✅
reference/specs/codec-api.md:✅
reference/specs/npy-codec.md:✅
explanation/whats-new-2.md:✅
llms-full.txt: Regenerated to pick up all fixesVerification
Impact
Related