I see someone asked this earlier,
#50
#44
But it's really confusing for new people when the author says,
On a side note, idb crate with builder feature also provides similar API.
And also, in response to a question for the difference,
Not much (anymore). Initially, idb was a wrapper over web-sys and rexie offered a builder pattern for creating object stores. Later, the builder pattern was merged in idb under builder feature (which rexie now uses).
I find it even more confusing and amazing when you own both the repositories, Rexie and idb. If you have the only value add that rexie offers is the builder pattern, and you've since decided to implement that in idb then Rexie is effectively deprecated right? It offers nothing?
If so, there is nothing wrong with that -- it happens a lot in software but please help the ecosystem clean up.
- Publish a new copy with Markdown that clearly says the package is deprecated.
- Put the word DEPRECATED in the title and description.
- Mark this repository as archived on Github.
This would clear up confusion and point people in the right direction. It's even more confusing when you describe deli as a further abstraction but it doesn't build on rexie, instead it builds upon idb.
Also just found #34
I see someone asked this earlier,
#50
#44
But it's really confusing for new people when the author says,
And also, in response to a question for the difference,
I find it even more confusing and amazing when you own both the repositories, Rexie and
idb. If you have the only value add that rexie offers is the builder pattern, and you've since decided to implement that inidbthen Rexie is effectively deprecated right? It offers nothing?If so, there is nothing wrong with that -- it happens a lot in software but please help the ecosystem clean up.
This would clear up confusion and point people in the right direction. It's even more confusing when you describe
delias a further abstraction but it doesn't build on rexie, instead it builds upon idb.Also just found #34