docs: expand patching how-to into a mature guide#1289
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 52 minutes and 55 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file). ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughExpands and rewrites ChangesPatching How-To Documentation
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
c6155b9 to
cf1cee3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@doc/howto/patching.rst`:
- Around line 336-372: Update the troubleshooting section to match the actual
dfetch tool output by making three corrections: in the "skipped — Uncommitted
changes" message, replace the em dash with a hyphen; in the "skipped — the
project was never fetched" message, replace the em dash with a hyphen and change
"never fetched" to "never fetched before"; and in the "skipped — there is no
patch file" message, replace the em dash with a hyphen. These changes ensure the
documented messages match exactly what users will see when running dfetch
commands.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 9da0d37b-60e6-4fa7-ad60-a472eba2f6cb
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
doc/howto/patching.rst
Add a Prerequisites section explaining that dfetch diff needs a committed upstream baseline before edits are made. Add an "Upgrading the upstream version" section with three explicit outcome paths: clean apply, fuzz-apply (refresh patch), and conflict (manual resolution + update-patch). Add a Troubleshooting section covering the five most common failure messages users encounter with patches. Expand the manifest wiring section to cover patch file organisation conventions and the behaviour of update-patch with multiple patches (always updates the last entry). Expand the format-patch section to document the --output-directory flag. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DsDq9BdiWvfxtL9HMvtmaa
cf1cee3 to
bba90a0
Compare
Add a Prerequisites section explaining that dfetch diff needs a
committed upstream baseline before edits are made.
Add an "Upgrading the upstream version" section with three explicit
outcome paths: clean apply, fuzz-apply (refresh patch), and conflict
(manual resolution + update-patch).
Add a Troubleshooting section covering the five most common failure
messages users encounter with patches.
Expand the manifest wiring section to cover patch file organisation
conventions and the behaviour of update-patch with multiple patches
(always updates the last entry).
Expand the format-patch section to document the --output-directory flag.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 noreply@anthropic.com
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DsDq9BdiWvfxtL9HMvtmaa
Summary by CodeRabbit