-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 578
[CoreCLR] support for debug build typemaps #10065
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
14 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2ceb8ba
Use assembly store for debug builds on CLR
grendello 0569267
Timing init fixlet + build deps
grendello 0d6e87c
Don't need this
grendello 9301886
Works. Sorta.
grendello 6d11083
New data structures LLVM IR generation
grendello 5084e79
A handful of fixlets, typemap appears to work fine now
grendello d556a02
Remove some debug stuff
grendello 9fbe256
Remove duplicate timing
grendello 9f7eb42
Fix after rebase
grendello 8eb6181
Fix after rebase
grendello 96f59a6
Fixes after rebase on `main`
grendello 140bf0d
Fix nullable issues after rebase on `main`
grendello cadb09f
Enable Debug CoreCLR runs for some smoke tests
grendello c038e2f
Use better looking code
grendello File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should
UniqueAssembliesbe aList<T>? If it were e.g.IEnumerable<TypeMapDebugAssembly>, this could avoid an "extra"List<TypeMapDebugAssembly>allocation. (Though that would also prolong the lifetime of theDictionary, so maybe theList<T>is a better tradeoff?)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think
List<T>is fine, it's lighter than the dictionary