This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
Improve Math.DivRem performance#8125
Merged
stephentoub merged 2 commits intodotnet:masterfrom Nov 15, 2016
Merged
Conversation
Until the JIT is able to eliminate one of the two idiv operations, using a multiplication and subtraction is measurably faster than an extra division.
|
I would aggresively inline it by default if it were my codebase. |
|
I'm not sure that using |
Member
Author
Reverting those |
Went through all uses of % looking for places DivRem could be used. This looks like it's the only one of note.
09039ea to
64edfc9
Compare
|
LGTM |
1 similar comment
|
LGTM |
jkotas
approved these changes
Nov 15, 2016
Member
Author
|
@dotnet-bot test Ubuntu x64 Checked Build and Test please (https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr/issues/6574) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Per the discussion at https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr/issues/3439, this PR at least temporarily changes the implementation of Math.DivRem to avoid two idiv instructions. It then replaces a few % and / pairs in mscorlib with Math.DivRem.
Perf test:
outputs for me:
cc: @jkotas, @mikedn, @redknightlois