Skip to content

Use correct namespace for async debugging helpers. Fixes #59015 - #2704

Closed
marek-safar wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
marek-safar:linker
Closed

Use correct namespace for async debugging helpers. Fixes #59015#2704
marek-safar wants to merge 1 commit into
dotnet:masterfrom
marek-safar:linker

Conversation

@marek-safar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@monojenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Build failure

@vargaz

vargaz commented Sep 15, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This should include the get_ObjectIdForDebugger () method as well.

@monojenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Build failure

1 similar comment
@monojenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Build failure

@spouliot spouliot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add some unit tests this time as this is a regression of https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037

@vargaz

vargaz commented Sep 15, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Its not a regression, the problem happens on android now.

@spouliot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@vargaz "[iOS]error: * Assertion at /Users/builder/data/lanes/4691/6bea7a5b/source/xamarin-macios/external/mono/mono/mini/debugger-agent.c:4712, condition `array->len == 1' not met while debugging async methods" from VERIFIED/FIXED from https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037

sounds very close to "2017-08-24 17:01:29.365 sampleSIGABRT.iOS[1952:392599] error: * Assertion at /Users/builder/data/lanes/5143/80f17b0b/source/xamarin-macios/external/mono/mono/mini/debugger-agent.c:4714, condition `array->len == 1' not met" from https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=59015

even if it seems (from the code) that it was never really fixed (but it did went thru all the process steps)

spouliot added a commit to spouliot/xamarin-macios that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2017
Replace dotnet#2704
It's almost identical but it adds unit tests so this does not regress.

The issue was already reported in [1] but the fix [2] was incorrect
and that was also missed when the bug was verified by QA [3].

[1] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
[2] dotnet#2004
[3] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037#c10
@spouliot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR #2782 does the same but adds unit tests

@spouliot spouliot closed this Sep 26, 2017
spouliot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
…015 (#2782)

Replace #2704
It's almost identical but it adds unit tests so this does not regress.

The issue was already reported in [1] but the fix [2] was incorrect
and that was also missed when the bug was verified by QA [3].

[1] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
[2] #2004
[3] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037#c10
spouliot added a commit to spouliot/xamarin-macios that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
…015 (dotnet#2782)

Replace dotnet#2704
It's almost identical but it adds unit tests so this does not regress.

The issue was already reported in [1] but the fix [2] was incorrect
and that was also missed when the bug was verified by QA [3].

[1] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
[2] dotnet#2004
[3] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037#c10
spouliot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
…015 (#2782) (#2788)

Replace #2704
It's almost identical but it adds unit tests so this does not regress.

The issue was already reported in [1] but the fix [2] was incorrect
and that was also missed when the bug was verified by QA [3].

[1] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037
[2] #2004
[3] https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=55037#c10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants