Add missing nullability annotation in CodeDom - #72532
Conversation
The `CodeTypeReference` constructors allow a `null` type name to be provided, but one constructor was missed during annotation.
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-codedom Issue DetailsThe
|
|
CodeDom hasn't been annotated yet. The annotations that are there are purely for where these files were included in other projects that are annotated and where these types are included as internal. You can see at: that it's one of our few remaining projects that's still <Nullable>annotations</Nullable>.
|
|
(If you'd like to actually annotate it and enable nullable reference types in the project, that would be more than welcome 😄) |
That's a head-scratcher. I filed this when I updated a package ref to |
|
It appears that |
Ugh! We should do a sweep and remove all #nullable enable and replace them with annotations on any projects that still need this... at this point I expect most of the usages are stale. |
Searching Would you prefer that I remove the #nullable enable in the |
I'm right in the middle of something, but I'll look at all of these today. |
|
Thanks. |
The
CodeTypeReferenceconstructors allow anulltype name to be provided, but one constructor was missed during annotation.