Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 5, 2025. It is now read-only.

Add eth.getChainId method to 1.x#3113

Merged
nivida merged 3 commits intoweb3:1.xfrom
bloq:add-getchainid
Oct 8, 2019
Merged

Add eth.getChainId method to 1.x#3113
nivida merged 3 commits intoweb3:1.xfrom
bloq:add-getchainid

Conversation

@gabmontes
Copy link
Contributor

@gabmontes gabmontes commented Oct 8, 2019

This method was added to the branch 2.x in d98cef2. This change is to support the method in the 1.x line.

Worth considering this PR in the discussion at #3070 .

@gabmontes gabmontes changed the title Add eth.getChainId method Add eth.getChainId method to 1.x Oct 8, 2019
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 8, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 83.067% when pulling 9f6c813 on bloq:add-getchainid into a790dd6 on ethereum:1.x.

@nivida nivida added 1.x 1.0 related issues Feature Request labels Oct 8, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@nivida nivida left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Thanks! :)

@nivida nivida requested a review from cgewecke October 8, 2019 21:39
Copy link
Collaborator

@cgewecke cgewecke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM as well.

NB: eth.getChainId needs to be added to the documentation at some point.

@nivida
Copy link
Contributor

nivida commented Oct 8, 2019

@cgewecke true that. It can be copied from the 2.x branch.

@gabmontes Do you have the time to do this for us?

This method was added to the branch 2.x in d98cef2. This change is to support the method in the 1.x line.
@gabmontes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nivida added docs and rebased to get rid of the merge conflict.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

1.x 1.0 related issues Feature Request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants