More conservative dependency update.#4238
Conversation
|
I think this does the opposite of what you think, see http://stackoverflow.com/a/22345808/564163 |
|
@zpao is out of town. I suspect that @mathieumg is correct and this does not do what we want, but @spicyj understands our build/packaging so we'll let him weigh in. |
|
Ohhh I see what you guys are saying. I didn't mean conservative as in tilde versus hat. My bad in word choice. I was actually referring to being more conservative in how I attempted to update dependencies compared to my previous PR #4125. I do understand that |
|
Yea this is fine. |
|
👍 |
|
@zpao I noticed you accepted but didn't merge. Is this blocking on anything? |
More conservative dependency update.
|
Nope! Merged now |
@zpao - this is a more conservative approach to updating some of the dependencies. Let me know what you think!