Skip to content

ref(up): Adding more context to up#279

Merged
IanWoodard merged 3 commits intomainfrom
ianwoodard/di-899-add-more-context-to-up-command
May 29, 2025
Merged

ref(up): Adding more context to up#279
IanWoodard merged 3 commits intomainfrom
ianwoodard/di-899-add-more-context-to-up-command

Conversation

@IanWoodard
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adding more context via spans and Sentry context. This will enable us to better track the performance of specific parts of the up command as well as better understand usage of the toggle command by tracking what dependencies are set to local runtimes when using up.

I broke off _install_service_dependencies as I felt it was more readable that way, especially since it would have been setting a variable in an even more nested context which would be easy to miss. I opted not to break more things off in the interest of keeping this PR on track.

I did my best to add as much context as seemed reasonable without overdoing it. If I missed anything crucial or added unnecessary context, let me know.

@IanWoodard IanWoodard requested a review from hubertdeng123 May 27, 2025 15:24
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented May 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.99%. Comparing base (a3c2613) to head (65e9f90).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #279      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.86%   94.99%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        2238     2299      +61     
==========================================
+ Hits         2123     2184      +61     
  Misses        115      115              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@hubertdeng123 hubertdeng123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Discussed offline, will add more custom spans in the future

@IanWoodard IanWoodard merged commit 4a55fa5 into main May 29, 2025
15 checks passed
@IanWoodard IanWoodard deleted the ianwoodard/di-899-add-more-context-to-up-command branch May 29, 2025 19:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants