Priority
Low
Description
The codebase uses execa() extensively for running shell commands, which creates a large attack surface for command injection vulnerabilities. Currently, there's no static analysis to detect unsafe usage patterns.
Impact
- Severity: Low (assuming current code is safe)
- Attack Vector: Command injection if user input flows to execa() calls
- Risk: Arbitrary command execution
Proposed Solution
- Add static analysis tool to detect unsafe execa() usage
- Consider using ESLint plugin for detecting command injection patterns
- Add unit tests for all execa() call sites with untrusted input
Tools to Consider
eslint-plugin-security
semgrep with custom rules
Effort Estimate
~4 hours
References
Priority
Low
Description
The codebase uses
execa()extensively for running shell commands, which creates a large attack surface for command injection vulnerabilities. Currently, there's no static analysis to detect unsafe usage patterns.Impact
Proposed Solution
Tools to Consider
eslint-plugin-securitysemgrepwith custom rulesEffort Estimate
~4 hours
References