Summary
| Metric |
Value |
| Issues analyzed |
149 |
| Closed issues |
99 |
| Open issues |
50 |
| Delivered Impact |
246 |
| Remaining Impact |
50 |
| Completion |
83.1% |
Analysis window: last 180 days (since 2025-12-11)
Top closed issues by value
| Issue |
Value signal |
Value |
Labels |
| #37902: [copilot-opt] Retry-blocked: [WIP] Fix failing GitHub Actions job 'agent'... |
high-priority |
50 |
bug, automation, high-priority, optimization, cookie, copilot-opt |
| #37901: [copilot-opt] 56% of workflow runs blocked by action_required approval... |
high-priority |
50 |
automation, high-priority, optimization, cookie, copilot-opt |
| #37900: [copilot-opt] Duplicate concurrent workflow instances on Agentic Commands... |
high-priority |
50 |
automation, high-priority, optimization, cookie, copilot-opt |
| #37988: [aw] Daily Credit Limit Test (Intentionally Broken) failed |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
| #37987: [aw] Contribution Check failed |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
| #37985: [aw] PR Triage Agent failed |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
| #37984: [aw] Issue Monster failed |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
| #37983: [aw] Daily Sentrux Report failed |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
| #37982: [aw] Daily Model Inventory Checker failed |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
| #37973: [aw] Daily Max AI Credits Test (Intentionally Fails) failed |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
Top open issues by value
| Issue |
Value signal |
Value |
Labels |
| #37990: [aw-failures] [aw] Failure Investigator (6h) - Issue Group |
unknown |
1 |
bug, automation, agentic-workflows, cookie |
| #37989: [aw-failures] Intermittent Copilot SDK auth failure ("Personal Access... |
unknown |
1 |
bug, automation, agentic-workflows, cookie |
| #37981: [aw] Detection Runs |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
| #37979: [refactor] Consolidate duplicated AST helpers across linter analyzers |
unknown |
1 |
code-quality, automated-analysis, refactoring, cookie |
| #37978: [aw] Daily Observability Report for AWF Firewall and MCP Gateway failed... |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
| #37971: [aw] PR Sous Chef failed |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
| #37963: [aw] No-Op Runs |
unknown |
1 |
agentic-workflows |
| #37836: samples mode: create_pull_request fails with ERR_SYSTEM merge-base for siderepo... |
unknown |
1 |
bug, mcp, workflows |
| #37835: apply_samples: push_to_pull_request_branch invents synthetic branch instead of... |
unknown |
1 |
bug, workflows, compiler |
| #35315: safe-outputs cross-repo base branch falls back to workflow repo default branch |
unknown |
1 |
bug, mcp, workflows |
Interpretation
With 83.1% completion (246 of 296 impact points delivered), the repository is actively resolving its tracked objectives. However, only 3 of 149 issues (2.0%) carry a priority or severity label, meaning the vast majority fall back to the unknown = 1 baseline. The three closed high-priority issues (value 50 each) alone contribute 150 of the 246 delivered impact points, while the remaining 96 closed issues contribute 1 point each.
For maintainers and PMs: the model is structurally sound but the completion percentage is currently dominated by those three issues. Once priority labels are applied consistently, the metric would reveal whether high-impact work is being resolved ahead of lower-priority items — making it a genuinely useful delivery signal.
Data quality
Priority and severity labels are rarely used in this repository. Out of 149 issues analyzed:
high-priority — 3 issues (P1 equivalent, value = 50, all closed)
- All other priority/severity patterns — 0 issues
The vast majority of labels are classification labels (agentic-workflows, automation, bug, cookie, etc.) which carry no priority weight under this model. The repository needs consistent priority or severity labeling for this metric to be meaningful. Consider adopting a convention such as P0–P3 or priority: high/medium/low and applying it to new and existing issues.
Generated by Objective Impact Report workflow — 2026-06-09
Generated by 📊 Objective Impact Report · sonnet46 1.5M · ◷
Summary
Top closed issues by value
high-prioritybug,automation,high-priority,optimization,cookie,copilot-opthigh-priorityautomation,high-priority,optimization,cookie,copilot-opthigh-priorityautomation,high-priority,optimization,cookie,copilot-optunknownagentic-workflowsunknownagentic-workflowsunknownagentic-workflowsunknownagentic-workflowsunknownagentic-workflowsunknownagentic-workflowsunknownagentic-workflowsTop open issues by value
unknownbug,automation,agentic-workflows,cookieunknownbug,automation,agentic-workflows,cookieunknownagentic-workflowsunknowncode-quality,automated-analysis,refactoring,cookieunknownagentic-workflowsunknownagentic-workflowsunknownagentic-workflowsunknownbug,mcp,workflowsunknownbug,workflows,compilerunknownbug,mcp,workflowsInterpretation
With 83.1% completion (246 of 296 impact points delivered), the repository is actively resolving its tracked objectives. However, only 3 of 149 issues (2.0%) carry a priority or severity label, meaning the vast majority fall back to the
unknown = 1baseline. The three closedhigh-priorityissues (value 50 each) alone contribute 150 of the 246 delivered impact points, while the remaining 96 closed issues contribute 1 point each.For maintainers and PMs: the model is structurally sound but the completion percentage is currently dominated by those three issues. Once priority labels are applied consistently, the metric would reveal whether high-impact work is being resolved ahead of lower-priority items — making it a genuinely useful delivery signal.
Data quality
Priority and severity labels are rarely used in this repository. Out of 149 issues analyzed:
high-priority— 3 issues (P1 equivalent, value = 50, all closed)The vast majority of labels are classification labels (
agentic-workflows,automation,bug,cookie, etc.) which carry no priority weight under this model. The repository needs consistent priority or severity labeling for this metric to be meaningful. Consider adopting a convention such asP0–P3orpriority: high/medium/lowand applying it to new and existing issues.Generated by Objective Impact Report workflow — 2026-06-09