[community] Update community contributions in README - #48758
Conversation
- Update list of 273 community contributors with latest Tier 0-2 attributions - Add 5 unresolved Tier 4 candidates for maintainer review (#47156, #44987, #42874, #42842, #37808) - Maintain alphabetical ordering and contribution counts per author Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
✅ Test Quality Sentinel completed test quality analysis. No test files were added or modified in this PR. Test Quality Sentinel skipped. |
|
Great work from the Daily Community Attribution Updater! 🤖 This automation is functioning well: ✅ Community attribution data refreshed — Updated contributor counts and flagged 5 attribution candidates for maintainer review. This PR looks ready to merge. The flagged candidates (#47156, #44987, #42874, #42842, #37808) are properly prepared for maintainer follow-up review. Note: This is an internal automation, so no prompt needed. Warning Firewall blocked 1 domainThe following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
network:
allowed:
- defaults
- "patchdiff.githubusercontent.com"See Network Configuration for more information.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates README community attribution data and flags unlinked issues for maintainer review.
Changes:
- Adds contributors and updates attribution counts.
- Refreshes five attribution candidates.
- Reorders and reformats candidate entries.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| README.md | Updates community attribution data and review candidates. |
Review details
Tip
Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
- Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
- Comments generated: 3
- Review effort level: Medium
|
|
||
| - [Community Feedback Discussions](https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/186451) | ||
| - [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/github/gh-aw/discussions) | ||
| We welcome your feedback on GitHub Agentic Workflows! |
|
|
||
| ## Peli's Agent Factory | ||
|
|
||
| See the [Peli's Agent Factory](https://github.com/github/gh-aw/blob/main/docs/src/content/docs/blog/2026-01-12-welcome-to-pelis-agent-factory.md) for a guided tour through many uses of agentic workflows. |
| - **@austenstone** for [[bug] Intake Triage agent job: MODULE_NOT_FOUND for merge_awf_model_multipliers.cjs (5 failures in 8d, v0.77.5)](https://github.com/github/gh-aw/issues/42874) — closed 2026-07-04, no confirmed PR linkage found | ||
| - **@bryanchen-d** for [safe-outputs: configured GH_AW_GITHUB_TOKEN shadows checkout token](https://github.com/github/gh-aw/issues/47156) — closed 2026-07-22, no confirmed PR linkage found | ||
| - **@G1Vh** for [`opencode` engine rejects `deepseek` (and google/groq/mistral/xai) providers present in `openCodeProviderDomains`](https://github.com/github/gh-aw/issues/37808) — closed 2026-07-09, no confirmed PR linkage found | ||
| - **@martinbriley** for [Request that the sentiment functionality emit events for sentiment analysis](https://github.com/github/gh-aw/issues/42842) — closed 2026-07-05, no confirmed PR linkage found | ||
| - **@Tarekchehahde** for [Document self-hosted Kubernetes DinD prerequisites for gh-aw (#40107)](https://github.com/github/gh-aw/issues/44987) — closed 2026-07-16, no confirmed PR linkage found |
|
🎉 This pull request is included in a new release. Release: |
Summary
Updates the community contributions section in README.md with the latest attribution data from the daily community attribution workflow.
Changes
@bryanchen-d— safe-outputs token shadowing issue@Tarekchehahde— Kubernetes DinD prerequisites documentation@austenstone— MODULE_NOT_FOUND intake triage bug@martinbriley— sentiment analysis events feature requestopencodeengine rejectsdeepseek(and google/groq/mistral/xai) providers present inopenCodeProviderDomains#37808@G1Vh— opencode provider support issueAttribution Method
Used the five-tier attribution strategy:
Next Steps
Maintainers should review the Attribution Candidates section to determine if any of the 5 flagged issues warrant credit to their reporters, then close the candidates accordingly.