feat: Add opam source (https://github.com/ocaml/security-advisories) to prod#4651
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Jan 22, 2026
another-rex
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2026
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for your approval, now that #4632 is sorted, this is fine to merge from my perspective. |
Contributor
|
/gcbrun |
ksealmalaysia41-lang
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2026
ksealmalaysia41-lang
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2026
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for merging. So far I haven't spotted any OSEC on the production osv.dev. Are there any issues with the import? On test.osv.dev they appear fine. |
Contributor
Author
|
As mentioned last week, I still cannot see these advisories on the production database. Any hints what's wrong with them? |
Contributor
Author
|
Checking today, I can see the OSEC entries. Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
similar to #4632, but this time to production instead of testing. ref #4581