Fix #799: Don't pass 'fields' query param to possibly non-existing subscription.#801
Merged
tseaver merged 1 commit intogoogleapis:masterfrom Apr 7, 2015
tseaver:799-work_around_cannot_bind_fields_query_param
Merged
Fix #799: Don't pass 'fields' query param to possibly non-existing subscription.#801tseaver merged 1 commit intogoogleapis:masterfrom tseaver:799-work_around_cannot_bind_fields_query_param
tseaver merged 1 commit intogoogleapis:masterfrom
tseaver:799-work_around_cannot_bind_fields_query_param
Conversation
googlebot
added
the
cla: yes
Contributor
|
LGTM. You mind if we leave #799 open (or file a new one) until the issue gets resolved with the service? |
Contributor
Author
|
@dhermes I don't mind -- payload size is going to be < MTU even if we don't pass it, though. |
Contributor
Author
|
Amended the commit to avoid closing #799 at merge. |
Contributor
|
@tseaver Thanks! I also updated the first message to match, as that would have closed it too. |
|
Changes Unknown when pulling 9bc46c4 on tseaver:799-work_around_cannot_bind_fields_query_param into * on GoogleCloudPlatform:master*. |
tseaver
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2015
…ds_query_param Fix #799: Don't pass 'fields' query param to possibly non-existing subscription.
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2025
* chore(deps): update all dependencies * 🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md --------- Co-authored-by: Lingqing Gan <lingqing.gan@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2025
* chore(deps): update all dependencies * 🦉 Updates from OwlBot post-processor See https://github.com/googleapis/repo-automation-bots/blob/main/packages/owl-bot/README.md --------- Co-authored-by: Lingqing Gan <lingqing.gan@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2025
Source-Link: googleapis/synthtool@bef813d Post-Processor: gcr.io/cloud-devrel-public-resources/owlbot-python:latest@sha256:94bb690db96e6242b2567a4860a94d48fa48696d092e51b0884a1a2c0a79a407 Co-authored-by: Owl Bot <gcf-owl-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
🤖 I have created a release \*beep\* \*boop\* --- ### [0.42.1](https://www.github.com/googleapis/gapic-generator-python/compare/v0.42.0...v0.42.1) (2021-03-04) ### Bug Fixes * corner case fix for empty request generated test ([#801](https://www.github.com/googleapis/gapic-generator-python/issues/801)) ([039dc71](https://www.github.com/googleapis/gapic-generator-python/commit/039dc713fed291142058741e1138da5a4bec542f)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
parthea
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
* build: fix mypy issues * remove mypy constraint --------- Co-authored-by: Daniel Sanche <d.sanche14@gmail.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2025
* feat: define `google.auth.downscoped.Credentials` class This is based on [Downscoping with Credential Access Boundaries](https://cloud.google.com/iam/docs/downscoping-short-lived-credentials). The new credentials are initialized mainly using elevated source credentials and a `google.auth.downscoped.CredentialAccessBoundary` instance. The credentials will then get access tokens from the source credentials and exchange them via the GCP STS token exchange endpoint using the provided credentials access boundary rules for downscoped access tokens. The new credentials will inherit the source credentials' scopes but the scopes are not exposed as we cannot always determine the scopes form the source credentials. * Fixes typos in comments. * Addresses review comments. * Moves all constants in the test file to module scope.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Work around #799 (leaving open while @tmatsuo investigates).
(UPDATED by @dhermes when original commit was amended)