BE-576: Upgrade `@napi-rs/cli` and `napi` crates to v3 by indietyp · Pull Request #8752 · hashintel/hash

indietyp · 2026-05-26T07:45:22Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

This upgrades the napi-rs ecosystem to its latest major versions — bumping @napi-rs/cli from 2.18.4 to 3.6.2 and the corresponding Rust crates (napi, napi-derive, napi-build, napi-sys) from v2 to v3. This brings in breaking changes to the NAPI build tooling, requiring updates to how build targets are declared and how the CLI output directory is specified.

🔗 Related links

https://napi.rs/

🔍 What does this change?

Upgrades @napi-rs/cli from 2.18.4 to 3.6.2 in the mise config.
Upgrades napi to 3.9.0, napi-derive to 3.5.6, napi-build to 2.3.2, and napi-sys to 3.2.1 in Cargo.toml.
Enables the type-def feature on napi-derive to support TypeScript type definition generation.
Updates the effect-dns-hickory build scripts to use the new CLI flag syntax (-o dist instead of positional dist argument).
Migrates the napi config in effect-dns-hickory/package.json from the old name/triples format to the new buildName/targets format, explicitly listing all supported targets including x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, x86_64-pc-windows-msvc, and x86_64-apple-darwin.
Removes the now-unused convert_case 0.6.0 and ctor 0.2.9 transitive dependencies, replacing them with convert_case 0.11.0 and ctor 1.0.6.
Updates libloading from 0.8.9 to 0.9.0.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

Existing build and integration tests for effect-dns-hickory.

❓ How to test this?

Checkout the branch.
Run yarn build in libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory.
Confirm the native module builds successfully and the generated impl.js and impl.d.ts files are emitted to dist.

vercel · 2026-05-26T07:45:27Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 2, 2026 8:28am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 2, 2026 8:28am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Jun 2, 2026 8:28am

cursor · 2026-05-26T07:45:31Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Major-version bumps to native build tooling and lockfile-wide napi transitive deps; risk is mainly broken native builds or wrong platform artifacts for effect-dns-hickory until builds are verified on target triples.

Overview
Upgrades the napi-rs stack to v3: @napi-rs/cli 2.18.4 → 3.6.2 in mise, and workspace Rust crates napi / napi-derive / napi-build / napi-sys to their v3-compatible versions, with type-def enabled on napi-derive for TS definitions.

For @local/effect-dns-hickory, build scripts now pass -o dist instead of a positional output path, regenerate-packages uses napi create-npm-dirs, and package.json napi config moves from name + triples.additional to binaryName + explicit targets (including x86_64 Linux/macOS/Windows). .gitignore ignores the generated libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory/npm tree; Cargo.lock reflects transitive dependency churn (e.g. libloading 0.9).

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 5e229c8. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

indietyp · 2026-05-26T07:45:36Z

BE-576: Upgrade @napi-rs/cli and napi crates to v3 #8752 👈 (View in Graphite)
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

augmentcode · 2026-05-26T07:48:12Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Upgrades the repo’s NAPI-RS toolchain to the v3 ecosystem to match the latest breaking changes in build/config conventions.

Changes:

Bumps @napi-rs/cli from 2.18.4 → 3.6.2 in mise
Updates Rust dependencies (napi, napi-derive, napi-build) to the v3-compatible versions and enables TS type-def generation
Adjusts effect-dns-hickory build scripts to use -o dist instead of positional output args
Migrates the package’s NAPI config from triples to an explicit targets list

Technical Notes: This aligns the native build + binding generation with the v3 CLI option/config schema to keep cross-platform builds working.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. 1 suggestion posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codecov · 2026-05-26T07:50:57Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.08%. Comparing base (188c0a5) to head (5e229c8).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8752      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.09%   59.08%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1344     1343       -1     
  Lines      129783   129731      -52     
  Branches     5869     5866       -3     
==========================================
- Hits        76699    76651      -48     
+ Misses      52181    52177       -4     
  Partials      903      903

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.41% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-backend-utils	`2.81% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`9.63% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.87% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.18% <ø> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`67.03% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.52% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.74% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`28.26% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`79.28% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.53% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`75.69% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.06% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`86.94% <ø> (-0.01%)`	⬇️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.06% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

codspeed-hq · 2026-05-26T07:53:57Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 80 untouched benchmarks

_{Comparing bm/be-576-update-napi-to-v3 (5e229c8) with main (7aa2018)¹}

No successful run was found on main (188c0a5) during the generation of this report, so 7aa2018 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

Copilot

Pull request overview

This PR updates the repo’s N-API build tooling configuration (notably for libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory) by bumping the @napi-rs/cli tool version and adjusting the CLI invocation/config to match the newer syntax, while also enabling napi-derive TypeScript type definition generation via the type-def feature.

Changes:

Bump @napi-rs/cli in mise and update effect-dns-hickory package.json scripts/config to the newer napi CLI syntax and explicit target listing.
Enable napi-derive’s type-def feature at the workspace dependency level.
Refresh Cargo.lock (including napi-build patch update and a libloading version change) and add a gitignore entry for the generated npm artifacts directory.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory/package.json	Updates `napi build` flags, `create-npm-dirs` script, and switches to explicit `targets` configuration.
Cargo.toml	Enables `napi-derive` `type-def` feature in workspace dependencies.
Cargo.lock	Updates resolved crate versions (incl. `napi-build` patch and `libloading` change).
.gitignore	Ignores generated `libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory/npm` directory.
.config/mise/config.toml	Bumps `@napi-rs/cli` tool version used by the repo.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 67605c4. Configure here.}

github-actions · 2026-06-02T09:39:37Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.936 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.54 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.663 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.675 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.192 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.794 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.559 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.436 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$14.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 114 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.271 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.782 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.630 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.245 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.557 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.050 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.483 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.138 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.039 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.097 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.208 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.77 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.891 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.237 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.356 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.845 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.277 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$47.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.674 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$51.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.416 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$45.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 328 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.871 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$64.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.482 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$62.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 389 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.403 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$57.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 382 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.713 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 666 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$57.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.73 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}15.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$273 \mathrm{ms} \pm 884 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.416 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.933 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$21.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 122 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 137 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.764 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$25.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.930 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.055 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$20.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-12.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.173 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.995 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$36.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.610 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$36.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 312 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.291 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.645 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$34.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 257 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$36.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$35.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$35.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.601 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 414 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 770 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.445 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 612 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 605 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.143 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 582 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 636 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.049 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 563 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.040 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 729 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.107 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 643 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.082 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 548 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.463 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 741 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 536 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$197 \mathrm{ms} \pm 760 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}49.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$199 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.88 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}36.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$41.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 218 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.483 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$562 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.05 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.214 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

feat: update napi

3d6b67f

graphite-app Bot assigned indietyp May 26, 2026

github-actions Bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels May 26, 2026

vercel Bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash May 26, 2026 07:46 Failure

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens May 26, 2026 07:47 View deployment

augmentcode Bot reviewed May 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory/package.json Outdated

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 26, 2026 07:48 View deployment

cursor Bot reviewed May 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory/package.json Outdated

Comment thread libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory/package.json

fix: buildName -> binaryName

c68d44d

vercel Bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 26, 2026 07:57 Inactive

fix: naming of create-npm-dirs and gitignore

67605c4

github-actions Bot added the area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) label May 26, 2026

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens May 26, 2026 08:02 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut May 26, 2026 08:03 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash May 26, 2026 08:12 View deployment

indietyp requested review from TimDiekmann and Copilot May 26, 2026 09:09

indietyp force-pushed the bm/be-576-update-napi-to-v3 branch from 243bc3a to 67605c4 Compare June 2, 2026 08:03

Copilot started reviewing on behalf of indietyp June 2, 2026 08:03 View session

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens June 2, 2026 08:05 View deployment

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread Cargo.toml Outdated

Comment thread libs/@local/effect-dns/hickory/package.json

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 2, 2026 08:08 View deployment

cursor Bot reviewed Jun 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread Cargo.toml Outdated

chore: properly upgrade napi

5e229c8

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens June 2, 2026 08:17 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut June 2, 2026 08:21 View deployment

vercel Bot deployed to Preview – hash June 2, 2026 08:28 View deployment

indietyp requested a review from thehabbos007 June 2, 2026 08:45

Conversation

indietyp commented May 26, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

indietyp commented May 26, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot commented May 26, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

vercel Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading