feat: full support for Audino - #3408
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 5 Skipped Deployments
|
Dzeranov
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2025
This was referenced Jun 23, 2025
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue tracking
Closes #3407; closes #3131
Context behind the change
Added full support for Audino in order to test it in production environment. Also found out that during escrow completion refactoring bug was introduced: invalid results file url used for payouts calculation, so fixing it here.
In order to properly display oracle name on UI also started to rely on the oracle name from KV instead of hardcoded mapping.
How has this been tested?
audinoqualificationvalidation_meta.jsonRelease plan
Taking into account that oracles are cached in HUMAN App Redis for 24h, we might want to remove such cached value in order to get oracles names on UI asap.
Potential risks; What to monitor; Rollback plan
Don't see any