Skip to content

Use a better rscale from Greengard 1988#115

Merged
inducer merged 4 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
isuruf:rscale
May 6, 2022
Merged

Use a better rscale from Greengard 1988#115
inducer merged 4 commits into
inducer:mainfrom
isuruf:rscale

Conversation

@isuruf

@isuruf isuruf commented May 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Needed for #113 to get one of the tests to pass with FFT.

@isuruf

isuruf commented May 5, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@inducer, this is ready.

@inducer inducer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! LGTM, just a bit of merge logistics to sort out.

Comment thread .github/workflows/ci.yml Outdated
run: |
curl -L -O https://tiker.net/ci-support-v0
. ./ci-support-v0
if [[ "$DOWNSTREAM_PROJECT" == "pytential" ]]; then

@inducer inducer May 6, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add a conditional that makes this turn itself off on main? Since this and the pytential PR are mutually dependent, the process I like is the following:

  • merge sumpy
  • observe broken (downstream) CI on sumpy main
  • drop branch spec on pytential
  • merge pytential
  • rerun previously broken sumpy main CI, observe fixed

@inducer inducer enabled auto-merge (squash) May 6, 2022 16:03
@inducer

inducer commented May 6, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Thanks! In it goes.

@inducer

inducer commented May 6, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

That is: I'm OK with merging this and pytential#150 using the procedure above. Could you take care of that?

@isuruf

isuruf commented May 6, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Sure. I'll do the merging with the given steps.

@inducer inducer merged commit e49f2e1 into inducer:main May 6, 2022
@isuruf isuruf deleted the rscale branch May 6, 2022 16:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants