FPV post: shorten the 'Explore the strike in 3-D' section#85
Merged
Conversation
Collapsed the pipeline walkthrough, scene description, and the three separate challenges paragraphs (quality/noise, scale ambiguity, work in progress) into three tight paragraphs. Kept both figures (scene_pipeline, scale_ambiguity) and every substantive point — pipeline steps, no measure tool yet and why, not every clip has a scene, sky/smoke/compression noise — just said in far fewer words. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YVLz2Gms21jzv8S6NE1XaT
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The "Explore the strike in 3-D" section (from #83, merged) had grown to 8 paragraphs across ~710 words — way out of proportion with the rest of the post. This cuts it to 3 tight paragraphs (~240 words, ~3x shorter), keeping both figures and every substantive point:
Nothing substantive was cut, just said in far fewer words — the three separate "challenges" paragraphs (quality, scale, work-in-progress) are now one.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01YVLz2Gms21jzv8S6NE1XaT
Generated by Claude Code