chore: release v3.0.19-cpp.29-beta.1

[xiyehutao]

🤔 这个变动的性质是？

• [✅] 新特性提交

⚠️ 请自检并全部勾选全部选项。⚠️

• [✅] 文档已补充或无须补充
• [✅] 代码演示已提供或无须提供
• [✅] TypeScript 定义已补充或无须补充
• [✅] fork仓库代码是否为最新避免文件冲突
• [✅] Files changed 没有 package.json lock 等无关文件

Summary by CodeRabbit

样式优化

• 样式
  • 改进了日历组件的样式选择器，优化了日期文字在各种交互状态（已激活、已禁用、已选择等）下的颜色显示效果和准确性。

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 5cf6a97d-3ca8-4abb-ba7d-8e10ff572fd0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64f12de and 664491e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/packages/calendar/calendar.scss

---

总体概览

本PR优化了日历组件中日期文本元素的CSS选择器，通过改进选择器特异性，确保.nut-calendar-day-info、.nut-calendar-day-day、.nut-calendar-day-info-curr等元素仅在对应状态类存在于同一父元素时才应用颜色样式。

变更详情

分组/文件(s)	摘要
日历样式选择器优化 src/packages/calendar/calendar.scss	调整CSS选择器以增强特异性，确保日期相关元素的颜色样式只在特定状态下（如active、disabled、choose等）应用，避免样式继承不当的问题。

估计代码审查工作量

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

相关PR

• fix: 修复clendar中color属性继承问题&顶部svg使用Image标签 #3447：同样修改日历样式文件中的选择器特异性规则，用于修复.nut-calendar-day-day/.nut-calendar-day-info-curr的颜色继承问题。

建议审查者

• xiaoyatong
• Alex-huxiyang
• irisSong

诗歌

🐰 选择器调优小兔说，
状态类和样式要配合，
特异性提升不含糊，
日期颜色更清晰啦！ ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	PR标题为发布版本号，与实际代码变更（日历组件SCSS选择器优化）无关，标题与变更集内容不符。	建议修改标题以准确反映实际代码变更，例如：'refactor: optimize calendar day element selectors specificity' 或类似描述SCSS选择器优化的标题。
Description check	⚠️ Warning	PR描述缺少关键信息，未填写相关Issue、需求背景和解决方案等必需部分，仅勾选了清单项而没有实质说明。	请补充完整的PR描述，包括：①选择正确的变动性质（应为'组件样式/交互改进'而非'新特性提交'）②填写相关Issue链接③说明需求背景和SCSS优化的具体原因④提供UI变动截图或说明。

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Review rate limit: 7/8 reviews remaining, refill in 7 minutes and 30 seconds.}

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}