upgrade core LTS to 2.346.1 and associated bom, fix test due to this upgrade#609
Conversation
…upgrade Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
f0c48e6 to
fc393c9
Compare
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
|
I have created the label |
|
Java 8 has one more line. |
|
I'm tempted to ignore Java 8 as anyway Jenkins has already moved to Java 11. |
…va 11 as minimum soon, it is just a temporary hack to get build working Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
|
now doesn't work on windows with Java 8.... |
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
|
so is it time to declare the test flaky yet or does it reliably fail somewhere? |
with the upgrade it's stable with linux/java11 and windows/java8. As we will probably move soon to java11 this will not be a problem. |
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy <olamy@apache.org>
| "Failed to generate new GitHub App Installation Token for app ID 54321: cached token is stale but has not expired", | ||
| // (error forced by wiremock - failed refresh on the agent) | ||
| // "Generating App Installation Token for app ID 54321 on agent", // 1 | ||
| "Generating App Installation Token for app ID 54321 for agent", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ahh..
@olamy this is incorrect - the test was failing due to JENKINS-69488 which is why my PR is breaking this test :)
Signed-off-by: Olivier Lamy olamy@apache.org