fix: flux kyverno tests & return stderr while reading kubeconfig via kwokctl#438
fix: flux kyverno tests & return stderr while reading kubeconfig via kwokctl#438k8s-ci-robot merged 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom prit342:kwok-return-stderr
Conversation
|
|
|
Welcome @prit342! |
|
Hi @prit342. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/ok-to-test |
|
The tests directly affected by this PR |
|
/retest |
|
xref: #440 Created a tracker for the kyverno failures. That test has been flaking to much lately. cc @vladimirvivien @cpanato I will take a look at this over the weekend to get it fixed. |
|
Thank you @harshanarayana for the pointers related to the flaky tests. I've added logic to check for the availability of all Kyverno related deployments before running tests. And after this change, the tests have not failed in subsequent runs. As indicated previously the tests related to |
|
/lgtm |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: harshanarayana, prit342 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
kwokctl get kubeconfigis captured and returned as part of the wrapped errorWhich issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #440
Special notes for your reviewer:
NoneDoes this PR introduce a user-facing change?
NoneAdditional documentation e.g., Usage docs, etc.:
None