Skip to content

test(COD-4237): only check if the list of expected is not 0#206

Merged
jeremydubreil merged 1 commit intomainfrom
update-expected-output
Jan 29, 2025
Merged

test(COD-4237): only check if the list of expected is not 0#206
jeremydubreil merged 1 commit intomainfrom
update-expected-output

Conversation

@jeremydubreil
Copy link
Contributor

@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil commented Nov 20, 2024

The SCA scan now finds one less finding than before on the test code.

@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil changed the title test(COD-3861): update the list of expected output test: update the list of expected output Nov 20, 2024
@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil marked this pull request as ready for review November 20, 2024 14:52
@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil marked this pull request as draft November 20, 2024 14:53
@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil force-pushed the update-expected-output branch from 225f8b1 to 92da6b6 Compare January 28, 2025 20:38
@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil changed the title test: update the list of expected output test(COD-4237): update the list of expected output Jan 28, 2025
@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2025 21:06
@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil requested a review from a team January 29, 2025 09:21
run: |
export SCA_RESULTS=`jq '.runs | map (.results | length) | add' sca.sarif`
expectedScaResults=5
expectedScaResults=4

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we leave this as an exact number instead of following the codesec approach that checks whether the expectedScaResults is just not 0?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we can do that in case the number of vulns reported is changing again. We did like that in the past to check that both SCA and SAST are working as expected.

@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil force-pushed the update-expected-output branch from 92da6b6 to 32a0f8f Compare January 29, 2025 10:47
@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil changed the title test(COD-4237): update the list of expected output test(COD-4237): only check if the list of expected is not 0 Jan 29, 2025
Copy link

@baltoiteodor baltoiteodor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil force-pushed the update-expected-output branch from 32a0f8f to 6db386e Compare January 29, 2025 11:47
@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil merged commit c06a22a into main Jan 29, 2025
3 checks passed
@jeremydubreil jeremydubreil deleted the update-expected-output branch January 29, 2025 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants