Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 15, 2026. It is now read-only.

chore: bump version to 6.0.25 - #203

Merged
FeiWang1119 merged 1 commit into
linuxdeepin:masterfrom
FeiWang1119:master
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

chore: bump version to 6.0.25#203
FeiWang1119 merged 1 commit into
linuxdeepin:masterfrom
FeiWang1119:master

Conversation

@FeiWang1119

Copy link
Copy Markdown

update changelog

update changelog
@deepin-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: FeiWang1119

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

deepin pr auto review

这个提交的改动主要是更新了debian/changelog文件,添加了一个新的版本记录。从代码审查的角度来看,这个改动是合理的,但可以提出以下建议:

  1. 版本号格式:确保版本号遵循标准的语义化版本控制(Semantic Versioning)格式,即主版本号.次版本号.修订号。例如,6.0.25是一个有效的版本号。

  2. 提交信息:在changelog文件中,提交信息应该简洁明了,并且包含足够的上下文信息,以便其他开发者理解这个版本的改动。虽然这个提交信息中包含了版本号,但可以进一步说明这个版本引入了哪些新功能或修复了哪些问题。

  3. 日期格式:日期格式应该统一,并且使用标准的日期格式。在这个例子中,日期格式是正确的,但建议检查整个changelog文件,确保日期格式的一致性。

  4. 签名:提交信息中包含了签名信息,这是好的做法,可以确保提交的作者身份。但是,确保签名信息是正确的,并且使用的是正确的签名工具。

  5. 版本号更新:在changelog文件中,版本号应该按照从新到旧的顺序排列。在这个例子中,新版本6.0.25应该放在旧版本6.0.24之前。

综上所述,这个提交的改动是合理的,但可以进一步改进提交信息,确保版本号格式和日期格式的一致性,以及按照从新到旧的顺序排列版本号。

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

TAG Bot

TAG: 6.0.25
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

@FeiWang1119

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/topic dtk6-6.0.25

@deepin-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add topic: dtk6-6.0.25 successed.

@FeiWang1119
FeiWang1119 merged commit 3fa8f28 into linuxdeepin:master Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants