Skip to content

fix: add missing WeChat group term in Chinese rules - #370

Merged
deepin-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
linuxdeepin:masterfrom
Johnson-zs:master
Jul 27, 2026
Merged

fix: add missing WeChat group term in Chinese rules#370
deepin-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
linuxdeepin:masterfrom
Johnson-zs:master

Conversation

@Johnson-zs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  1. Added "微信群" to the pattern list for WeChat-related file locations
    in Chinese localization rules
  2. This term was missing from the previous pattern while other similar
    terms were already included
  3. Ensures more comprehensive matching of WeChat source references in
    Chinese queries

Log: Improved WeChat file location detection by adding missing group
term

Influence:

  1. Test Chinese file searches containing "微信群" term
  2. Verify all other existing WeChat terms still work as expected
  3. Check for any overlaps or conflicts with other location patterns
  4. Validate search results for files from WeChat groups

fix: 在中文规则中添加缺失的微信群术语

  1. 在微信相关文件位置的中文本地化规则模式中添加了"微信群"
  2. 这个术语之前遗漏了,而其他相似术语已包含在列表中
  3. 确保了中文查询中对微信来源引用的更全面匹配

Log: 通过添加缺失的群组术语改进了微信文件位置检测

Influence:

  1. 测试包含"微信群"术语的中文文件搜索
  2. 验证所有其他现有的微信术语仍正常工作
  3. 检查与其他位置模式是否有重叠或冲突
  4. 验证来自微信群组的文件搜索结果

Fixes: #371521

1. Added "微信群" to the pattern list for WeChat-related file locations
in Chinese localization rules
2. This term was missing from the previous pattern while other similar
terms were already included
3. Ensures more comprehensive matching of WeChat source references in
Chinese queries

Log: Improved WeChat file location detection by adding missing group
term

Influence:
1. Test Chinese file searches containing "微信群" term
2. Verify all other existing WeChat terms still work as expected
3. Check for any overlaps or conflicts with other location patterns
4. Validate search results for files from WeChat groups

fix: 在中文规则中添加缺失的微信群术语

1. 在微信相关文件位置的中文本地化规则模式中添加了"微信群"
2. 这个术语之前遗漏了,而其他相似术语已包含在列表中
3. 确保了中文查询中对微信来源引用的更全面匹配

Log: 通过添加缺失的群组术语改进了微信文件位置检测

Influence:
1. 测试包含"微信群"术语的中文文件搜索
2. 验证所有其他现有的微信术语仍正常工作
3. 检查与其他位置模式是否有重叠或冲突
4. 验证来自微信群组的文件搜索结果

Fixes: #371521

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry @Johnson-zs, you have reached your weekly rate limit of 500000 diff characters.

Please try again later or upgrade to continue using Sourcery

@deepin-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Johnson-zs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

deepin pr auto review

★ 总体评分:100分

■ 【总体评价】

代码修改正确增加了正则匹配模式,确保了语义搜索中长模式的优先匹配。
逻辑严谨且符合正则匹配原则,无安全漏洞,质量优秀。

■ 【详细分析】

  • 1.语法逻辑(完全正确)✓

location_rules.jsonloc_wechat_data 规则中,新增了 微信群 模式并正确置于 微信 之前,符合正则交替匹配从左到右短路的原则。
潜在问题:无
建议:无需修改

  • 2.代码质量(良好)✓

修改遵循了最长匹配优先的设计原则,且 description 字段对此有明确说明,可读性良好。
潜在问题:无
建议:无需修改

  • 3.代码性能(无性能问题)✓

仅在正则表达式中增加了一个普通字符串分支,对正则引擎的匹配开销影响极小。
潜在问题:无
建议:无需修改

  • 4.代码安全(存在0个安全漏洞)✓

漏洞对比统计:新增漏洞 0 个,减少漏洞 0 个,持平 0 个
本次修改仅涉及本地搜索规则的正则模式调整,无外部输入处理或敏感操作,不存在安全风险。

  • 建议:无需修改

■ 【改进建议代码示例】

{
    "id": "loc_wechat_data",
    "pattern": "微信发给我的|微信发我的|微信接收的|微信群里的|微信群里|微信群|微信里|微信|vx|wechat",
    "description": "WeChat received files directory — longer patterns first for maximal span consumption",
    "enabled": true,
    "priority": 180
}

@Johnson-zs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/forcemerge

@deepin-bot

deepin-bot Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pr force merged! (status: blocked)

@deepin-bot
deepin-bot Bot merged commit c08c80b into linuxdeepin:master Jul 27, 2026
20 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants