Conversation
bajtos
requested review from
b-admike,
dhmlau,
jannyHou,
virkt25 and
zbarbuto
as code owners
October 4, 2018 10:09
13 tasks
Member
|
@bajtos , should we make the |
Member
Author
Thank you for the reminder! I have already created that branch but forgot to push it to GitHub. It's online now, see here: https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-datasource-juggler/tree/3.x |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As part of LoopBack 4.0 GA release, I am proposing to publish a 4.0 release of juggler as Current, move juggler@3.x into Active LTS and move strong-remoting@3.x into Active LTS (with no Current release line). My argument is that loopback@3.x is moving to Active LTS and we don't want loopback@3.x to receive new features from the juggler/remoting dependency, as new features are more likely to introduce unintended problems. Instead, I'd like to have everything under LoopBack 3.x umbrella in Active LTS to clearly communicate those versions are considered as stable and suitable for wide use.
We don't have bandwidth to do backwards-incompatible cleanup while we are making a new major version of juggler. But! We can still drop support for Node.js 6.x as part of this release, this will allow us to start migrating the code base to async/await style without necessarily breaking backwards compatibility.