Merged
Conversation
mre
force-pushed
the
dockerless
branch
2 times, most recently
from
050c957 to
dda25ce
Compare
Move to composite action as described in https://dev.to/github/build-your-own-github-action-without-a-docker-container-1eic. The goal is to improve runtime by avoiding to build a Docker image
mre
force-pushed
the
dockerless
branch
5 times, most recently
from
2d6c058 to
4fe8725
Compare
Contributor
|
Just want to say this is awesome. Thanks! |
YDX-2147483647
added a commit
to YDX-2147483647/lychee-action
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
This commit also makes sure `outputs.exit_code` is “The exit code returned from Lychee”. `failIfEmpty` no longer changes it to `1`. Relevant docs: - [Setting exit codes for actions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/sharing-automations/creating-actions/setting-exit-codes-for-actions) - [exit - POSIX Programmer's Manual](https://manned.org/exit.1posix) Relates to lycheeverse#86, lycheeverse#128, lycheeverse#145, lycheeverse#245, and lycheeverse#251.
This was referenced Nov 5, 2024
YDX-2147483647
added a commit
to YDX-2147483647/lychee-action
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
The previous expression always gives `false`. Both `env.exit_code` and `env.lychee_exit_code` are `null`, probably since the docker→composite refactor lycheeverse#128. When GitHub evaluates the expression, it finds the types do not match, and coerces them to number, namely, `null` → `0`. See [Evaluate expressions in workflows and actions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/evaluate-expressions-in-workflows-and-actions#operators). Relates to lycheeverse#253.
YDX-2147483647
added a commit
to YDX-2147483647/lychee-action
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
This commit also makes sure `outputs.exit_code` is “The exit code returned from Lychee”. `failIfEmpty` no longer changes it to `1`. Relevant docs: - [Setting exit codes for actions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/sharing-automations/creating-actions/setting-exit-codes-for-actions) - [exit - POSIX Programmer's Manual](https://manned.org/exit.1posix) Relates to lycheeverse#86, lycheeverse#128, lycheeverse#145, lycheeverse#245, and lycheeverse#251.
YDX-2147483647
added a commit
to YDX-2147483647/lychee-action
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
The previous expression always gives `false`. Both `env.exit_code` and `env.lychee_exit_code` are `null`, probably since the docker→composite refactor lycheeverse#128. When GitHub evaluates the expression, it finds the types do not match, and coerces them to number, namely, `null` → `0`. See [Evaluate expressions in workflows and actions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/evaluate-expressions-in-workflows-and-actions#operators). Relates to lycheeverse#253.
YDX-2147483647
added a commit
to YDX-2147483647/lychee-action
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
This commit also makes sure `outputs.exit_code` is “The exit code returned from Lychee”. `failIfEmpty` no longer changes it to `1`. Relevant docs: - [Setting exit codes for actions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/sharing-automations/creating-actions/setting-exit-codes-for-actions) - [exit - POSIX Programmer's Manual](https://manned.org/exit.1posix) Relates to lycheeverse#86, lycheeverse#128, lycheeverse#145, lycheeverse#245, and lycheeverse#251.
YDX-2147483647
added a commit
to YDX-2147483647/lychee-action
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
The previous expression always gives `false`. Both `env.exit_code` and `env.lychee_exit_code` are `null`, probably since the docker→composite refactor lycheeverse#128. When GitHub evaluates the expression, it finds the types do not match, and coerces them to number, namely, `null` → `0`. See [Evaluate expressions in workflows and actions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/evaluate-expressions-in-workflows-and-actions#operators). Relates to lycheeverse#253.
YDX-2147483647
added a commit
to YDX-2147483647/lychee-action
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
This commit also makes sure `outputs.exit_code` is “The exit code returned from Lychee”. `failIfEmpty` no longer changes it to `1`. Relevant docs: - [Setting exit codes for actions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/sharing-automations/creating-actions/setting-exit-codes-for-actions) - [exit - POSIX Programmer's Manual](https://manned.org/exit.1posix) Relates to lycheeverse#86, lycheeverse#128, lycheeverse#145, lycheeverse#245, and lycheeverse#251.
YDX-2147483647
added a commit
to YDX-2147483647/lychee-action
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
The previous expression always gives `false`. Both `env.exit_code` and `env.lychee_exit_code` are `null`, probably since the docker→composite refactor lycheeverse#128. When GitHub evaluates the expression, it finds the types do not match, and coerces them to number, namely, `null` → `0`. See [Evaluate expressions in workflows and actions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/evaluate-expressions-in-workflows-and-actions#operators). Relates to lycheeverse#253.
mre
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 7, 2024
- **fix: Make `fail: false` effective even when `failIfEmpty: true`** This commit also makes sure `outputs.exit_code` is “The exit code returned from Lychee”. `failIfEmpty` no longer changes it to `1`. Relevant docs: - [Setting exit codes for actions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/sharing-automations/creating-actions/setting-exit-codes-for-actions) - [exit - POSIX Programmer's Manual](https://manned.org/exit.1posix) Relates to #86, #128, #145, #245, and #251. - **fix: Update `env.exit_code` to `outputs.exit_code`** The previous expression always gives `false`. Both `env.exit_code` and `env.lychee_exit_code` are `null`, probably since the docker→composite refactor #128. When GitHub evaluates the expression, it finds the types do not match, and coerces them to number, namely, `null` → `0`. See [Evaluate expressions in workflows and actions - GitHub Docs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/evaluate-expressions-in-workflows-and-actions#operators). Relates to #253. Co-authored-by: Sebastiaan Speck <12570668+sebastiaanspeck@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #121