[CODE] Issues compiling using the everthing makefile on Linux

[TheAwesome98-Real]

Describe the bug

A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
When compiling on Linux (and probably other POSIX OSes like macOS), there are multiple issues:

• case sensitivity - Color.h is included as color.h in some files, and some windowimpostor thing
• gcc9+support.o is never built
• missing symbols for discord rich presence

Steps to reproduce

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Generate the everything Makefile
2. make using it

Expected behavior

It should build

Actual behavior

It doesn't

Additional context

(Optional) Add any other context about the problem here.

[TheAwesome98-Real]

I also tried the games Makefile and I got this error
error: ‘g_pScriptVM’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘IScriptVM’?

[TheAwesome98-Real]

maybe I could undefine MAPBASE_VSCRIPT but I do want vscript support

[z33ky]

Try the "develop" branch. At least the issue with gcc9+support.o is fixed there.

[TheAwesome98-Real]

got error /usr/bin/ld.gold: error: ../../devtools/gcc9+support.o: incompatible target

not exactly sure what it means but i got it when i compiled the .o file myself using the master branch

[TheAwesome98-Real]

ah - the gcc9+support.o was compiled for x86_64 while it should've been compiled for i386

[TheAwesome98-Real]

great! i've fixed gcc9+support by adding -m32, but now linking fails because of missing symbols discord rich presence

[z33ky]

I've never built with Discord RPC. If you don't want it you can disable it by removing it from sp/src/vpc_scripts/source_base.vpc:23.

[TheAwesome98-Real]

i would like to build with it. do i just have to link with the discord_game_sdk.so, and if so, how?

[TheAwesome98-Real]

i tried without anyway but i'm still missing the symbol GetScriptHookManager()

[Blixibon]

@TheAwesome98-Real The issue with GetScriptHookManager() should now be fixed on the develop branch for the upcoming v7.1 update. The issues with Discord RPC will be resolved at a later time, but are you able to try it without that again and see if you have any more problems?