Merged
Conversation
ProjectsByJackHe
previously approved these changes
Mar 13, 2026
guhetier
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2026
ProjectsByJackHe
approved these changes
Mar 13, 2026
guhetier
reviewed
Mar 13, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Describe the purpose of and changes within this Pull Request.
When adding a sample of sharing an XSK socket across processes, we hit an excessively restrictive state check: the socket needed to be unbound to register a UMEM, when the only practical requirement is that the socket isn't closing.
Testing
Do any existing tests cover this change? Are new tests needed?
Tests added, and also locally tested in #980
Documentation
Is there any documentation impact for this change?
Updated.
Installation
Is there any installer impact for this change?
N/A.