FUSION-DENSE-MIGRATE (#299, PR #324) folded the gate/up of commandr, glm4,
minicpm, minicpm3 and phi3 onto layers::UnquantizedMlpGateUpMethod. The
change is byte-exact by construction and was gated on CPU, but the five SACRED
token-exact gates it touches are checkpoint-gated and dgx-only — on a CPU box
they emit a loud SKIP at 0 assertions, so the empirical confirmation is OWED,
not passed. #299 closes with the fold; this issue is the handle for the runs, so
"PENDING" is tracked somewhere other than prose.
Owed on dgx (GB10), against the pinned oracle
| Gate binary |
Checkpoint |
test_commandr_paged_engine |
CohereForCausalLM (Command-R) |
test_glm4_paged_engine |
Glm4ForCausalLM (GLM-4-9B-0414) |
test_minicpm_paged_engine |
MiniCPMForCausalLM (MiniCPM-2B-sft-bf16) |
test_minicpm3_paged_engine |
MiniCPM3ForCausalLM (MiniCPM3-4B) |
test_phi3_paged_engine |
Phi3ForCausalLM (Phi-4-mini-instruct) |
Done when
All five run on dgx at the merged SHA and report their declared verdict (STRICT
where the gate is token-exact, the ratified near-tie band where it is not), with
the result recorded on the FUSION-DENSE-MIGRATE parity-ledger line. A failure
is a real forward divergence and reopens the fold, not this issue.
What already stands without the GPU
- Op-sequence identity: each replaced body was the seam's
Apply with M
spelled T, and every call site passes a DBuf{T,H}.
test_linear_method — byte-exact seam vs the standalone sequence at M=1 and
M=4.
test_dense_gate_up_seam_forward — the four dense folded TUs driven through
their REAL forward on CPU over synthetic in-memory weights (no checkpoint),
pinning the gate/up split and half order analytically. minicpm3 is the one
folded TU that harness does not drive (MLA attention + load-time kv_b_proj
absorption), so its CPU coverage is the seam unit test only.
FUSION-DENSE-MIGRATE(#299, PR #324) folded the gate/up ofcommandr,glm4,minicpm,minicpm3andphi3ontolayers::UnquantizedMlpGateUpMethod. Thechange is byte-exact by construction and was gated on CPU, but the five SACRED
token-exact gates it touches are checkpoint-gated and dgx-only — on a CPU box
they emit a loud SKIP at 0 assertions, so the empirical confirmation is OWED,
not passed. #299 closes with the fold; this issue is the handle for the runs, so
"PENDING" is tracked somewhere other than prose.
Owed on dgx (GB10), against the pinned oracle
test_commandr_paged_engineCohereForCausalLM(Command-R)test_glm4_paged_engineGlm4ForCausalLM(GLM-4-9B-0414)test_minicpm_paged_engineMiniCPMForCausalLM(MiniCPM-2B-sft-bf16)test_minicpm3_paged_engineMiniCPM3ForCausalLM(MiniCPM3-4B)test_phi3_paged_enginePhi3ForCausalLM(Phi-4-mini-instruct)Done when
All five run on dgx at the merged SHA and report their declared verdict (STRICT
where the gate is token-exact, the ratified near-tie band where it is not), with
the result recorded on the
FUSION-DENSE-MIGRATEparity-ledger line. A failureis a real forward divergence and reopens the fold, not this issue.
What already stands without the GPU
ApplywithMspelled
T, and every call site passes aDBuf{T,H}.test_linear_method— byte-exact seam vs the standalone sequence atM=1andM=4.test_dense_gate_up_seam_forward— the four dense folded TUs driven throughtheir REAL forward on CPU over synthetic in-memory weights (no checkpoint),
pinning the gate/up split and half order analytically.
minicpm3is the onefolded TU that harness does not drive (MLA attention + load-time kv_b_proj
absorption), so its CPU coverage is the seam unit test only.