Currently, the modified column in the database is of type TEXT (using the format yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss). Is there a reason for that? In my view, it should be of type INTEGER (using the unix epoch), since this should require less space, sorting should be faster etc. But maybe, I've overseen something.
Currently, the
modifiedcolumn in the database is of typeTEXT(using the formatyyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss). Is there a reason for that? In my view, it should be of typeINTEGER(using the unix epoch), since this should require less space, sorting should be faster etc. But maybe, I've overseen something.