coverage: make coverage work for Node.js#23941
Conversation
|
CC: @nodejs/testing |
5e15383 to
b04d594
Compare
|
landed in 4df8c26 |
|
Force pushed out. No metadata, 'coverage' is not a valid subsystem. |
|
Commits were landed since the last CI run, so running CI again: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/18321/ |
|
(I'll re-land this once CI is good.) |
|
(Also: One more data point for a commit queue!!! People who land commits once in a while shouldn't have to remember/re-learn the process!) |
|
Big commit-queue fan here, but |
|
Landed in 616fac9 |
PR-URL: nodejs#23941 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
|
sorry about that, I used |
|
So I am thinking...what if we implement a |
Personally I'm not a big fan of the |
I don't really like them either, but couldn't think of anything better :(
Sounds like a good idea to me, although what does NJILK mean? EDIT: oh, the PR ID? |
the PR_ID |
PR-URL: #23941 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
|
@bcoe do you think this is a candidate for backporting to |
This pull request gets coverage working for Node.js' own internal libraries, I've:
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes