Conversation
nodejs-github-bot
added
the
meta
Member
Author
|
Here's what the mixing of em dashes with hyphens ends up looking like in the CHANGELOG. Notice the difference between the length of the hyphen/dash between the first three entries and the remaining entries.
|
richardlau
requested changes
Mar 4, 2020
Member
|
The first "inconsistency" is mispelled in the commit message. |
Trott
force-pushed
the
de-dash
branch
2 times, most recently
from
eca3997 to
e474cb3
Compare
Collaborator
richardlau
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2020
richardlau
added
the
author ready
jasnell
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2020
lpinca
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2020
Our documentation uses em dashes inconsistently. They are treated inconsistently typographically too. (For example, they are sometimes surrounded by spaces and sometimes not.) They are also often confused with ordinary hyphens such as in the CHANGELOG, where they are inadvertently mixed together in a single list. The difference is not obvious in the raw markdown but is very noticeable when rendered, appearing to be a typographical error (which it in fact is). The em dash is never needed. There are always alternatives. Remove em dashes entirely. PR-URL: nodejs#32080 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Member
Author
|
Landed in b6cd215 |
4 tasks
Member
|
@Trott I'd overlooked when reviewing that the regexp in the doc tool is also in |
3 tasks
Member
|
I've created #32146 to backport this PR to v12.x. |
puzpuzpuz
pushed a commit
to puzpuzpuz/node
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2020
Our documentation uses em dashes inconsistently. They are treated inconsistently typographically too. (For example, they are sometimes surrounded by spaces and sometimes not.) They are also often confused with ordinary hyphens such as in the CHANGELOG, where they are inadvertently mixed together in a single list. The difference is not obvious in the raw markdown but is very noticeable when rendered, appearing to be a typographical error (which it in fact is). The em dash is never needed. There are always alternatives. Remove em dashes entirely. PR-URL: nodejs#32080 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Member
Author
|
Argh, I should have split the CHANGELOG and doc-tool change into its own commit. Thanks, @richardlau and @puzpuzpuz. |
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2020
Our documentation uses em dashes inconsistently. They are treated inconsistently typographically too. (For example, they are sometimes surrounded by spaces and sometimes not.) They are also often confused with ordinary hyphens such as in the CHANGELOG, where they are inadvertently mixed together in a single list. The difference is not obvious in the raw markdown but is very noticeable when rendered, appearing to be a typographical error (which it in fact is). The em dash is never needed. There are always alternatives. Remove em dashes entirely. PR-URL: nodejs#32080 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
3 tasks
Member
Author
|
v10.x backport: #32149 |
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2020
Our documentation uses em dashes inconsistently. They are treated inconsistently typographically too. (For example, they are sometimes surrounded by spaces and sometimes not.) They are also often confused with ordinary hyphens such as in the CHANGELOG, where they are inadvertently mixed together in a single list. The difference is not obvious in the raw markdown but is very noticeable when rendered, appearing to be a typographical error (which it in fact is). The em dash is never needed. There are always alternatives. Remove em dashes entirely. PR-URL: #32080 Backport-PR-URL: #32149 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2020
Our documentation uses em dashes inconsistently. They are treated inconsistently typographically too. (For example, they are sometimes surrounded by spaces and sometimes not.) They are also often confused with ordinary hyphens such as in the CHANGELOG, where they are inadvertently mixed together in a single list. The difference is not obvious in the raw markdown but is very noticeable when rendered, appearing to be a typographical error (which it in fact is). The em dash is never needed. There are always alternatives. Remove em dashes entirely. PR-URL: #32080 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Merged
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2020
Our documentation uses em dashes inconsistently. They are treated inconsistently typographically too. (For example, they are sometimes surrounded by spaces and sometimes not.) They are also often confused with ordinary hyphens such as in the CHANGELOG, where they are inadvertently mixed together in a single list. The difference is not obvious in the raw markdown but is very noticeable when rendered, appearing to be a typographical error (which it in fact is). The em dash is never needed. There are always alternatives. Remove em dashes entirely. PR-URL: #32080 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> PR-URL: #32146 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <vlad2t@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Our documentation uses em dashes inconsistently. They are treated
inconsistently typographically too. (For example, they are sometimes
surrounded by spaces and sometimes not.) They are also often confused
with ordinary hyphens such as in the CHANGELOG, where they are
inadvertently mixed together in a single list. The difference is
not obvious in the raw markdown but is very noticeable when rendered,
appearing to be a typographical error (which it in fact is).
The em dash is never needed. There are always alternatives. Remove em
dashes entirely.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes