cache-control: no-cache: use quoted-string form#4177
Merged
Conversation
added 3 commits
April 23, 2025 05:13
Update comment and test examples of qualified no-cache directives (no-cache=...) to use the quoted-string form instead of the token form. Per https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9111.html#cache-response-directive.no-cache: > This directive uses the quoted-string form of the argument syntax. A sender SHOULD NOT generate the token form (even if quoting appears not to be needed for single-entry lists).
Contributor
Author
|
The undici/test/cache-interceptor/utils.js Lines 68 to 96 in 0daba93 Would it be better to only allow quote-string format? |
Member
@flakey5 was this due to the compatibility tests? |
Member
Yes. If this isn't wanted behavior, the test cases for it in the caching suite will need to be added to the |
Uzlopak
approved these changes
Aug 13, 2025
Uzlopak
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well, I guess it isnt harming
Merged
slagiewka
pushed a commit
to slagiewka/undici
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2026
* cache-control: no-cache: use quoted-string form Update comment and test examples of qualified no-cache directives (no-cache=...) to use the quoted-string form instead of the token form. Per https://httpwg.org/specs/rfc9111.html#cache-response-directive.no-cache: > This directive uses the quoted-string form of the argument syntax. A sender SHOULD NOT generate the token form (even if quoting appears not to be needed for single-entry lists). * revert deliberate test case * revert some changes --------- Co-authored-by: alxndrsn <alxndrsn>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update comment example of qualified no-cache directives (
no-cache=...) to use the quoted-string form instead of the token form.Per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9111#name-no-cache-2:
This relates to...
cache-controlresponse header's qualifiedno-cachedirective.Rationale
Seems more correct to follow spec recommendations in documentation.
Support for token form seems to be deliberate:
undici/test/cache-interceptor/utils.js
Lines 68 to 96 in 0daba93
Changes
Update comment and test examples of qualified no-cache directives (
no-cache=...) to use the quoted-string form instead of the token form.Features
N/A
Bug Fixes
N/A
Breaking Changes and Deprecations
Should not break anything, as no code changed.
Status