Japanese survey

[AndrejKiri]

Adding a new survey to the repo. Please review. So far it is just a README file and csv with data. We will add analysis later, once it is ready.

[AndrejKiri]

FYI @E-STAT @ymotongpoo @austinlparker

[E-STAT]

Thanks so much for doing this @AndrejKiri

[ymotongpoo]

@AndrejKiri @E-STAT We didn't ask for the user consent to share the answer publicly. Given that, the raw data should not be publicly shared.
ref: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/14-392OfyoCezrDQKyO5LhCQGyBhTSJvR-9MLgPQ0maU/edit

[AndrejKiri]

@ymotongpoo Fair point. Thanks for raising it.

In the past, we shared data for all surveys that SIG End-user conducted in our repo by default. I don't think we asked for consent for any of them. But that doesn't mean it wasn't a mistake. We should start doing that for sure. Here is an issue to make sure we do it in the future.

For this particular case, I am wondering if there is anything we can do to still publish the data. 🤔 I think the data is pretty anonymous already. We can make potential identification of individual respondents even harder by breaking the data set into multiple .csv files—e.g., having demographic questions separate, open-ended questions separate, and the rest of the questions separate. That way there is IMO no way to identify who responded what. Would it be sufficient, or do you think we shouldn't publish the data anyway?

@avillela @danielgblanco @reese-lee What do you think about it? Did we get similar feedback in the past?

[danielgblanco]

Is the PDF missing?

[AndrejKiri]

@danielgblanco Yes, the analysis is not finished yet. I would add it later on. My intention here was to share out the data so if folks in the community are curious, they can do their own analysis.

However, before merging, we should for sure address Yoshi's comment above. I shared my perspective there. I would love to hear what you think about it.