Skip to content

Replace SkillsManager with SkillsService#28705

Merged
jif-oai merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
jif/skills-service
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Replace SkillsManager with SkillsService#28705
jif-oai merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
jif/skills-service

Conversation

@jif-oai

@jif-oai jif-oai commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why

Host skill discovery was still exposed as a manager even though it is a process-owned service shared by sessions, the app-server catalog, and file-watcher invalidation. The skills extension also consumed an ad hoc loaded-skills wrapper instead of a named immutable snapshot.

What changed

  • replace SkillsManager with concrete SkillsService
  • make the service cache and return immutable HostSkillsSnapshot values
  • migrate the skills extension host provider to the snapshot boundary
  • migrate app-server catalog, watcher, and invalidation paths to the service

This keeps the service limited to host discovery, caching, roots, and invalidation. Catalog rendering and invocation remain extension responsibilities for the next stacked change.

@jif-oai

jif-oai commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 74b01ae24c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread codex-rs/core-skills/src/model.rs Outdated
@jif-oai
jif-oai marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2026 12:55
@jif-oai
jif-oai requested a review from a team as a code owner June 17, 2026 12:55
@jif-oai

jif-oai commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: eb5e15af5a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread codex-rs/core-api/src/lib.rs
@jif-oai

jif-oai commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful!

Reviewed commit: eb5e15af5a

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@jif-oai
jif-oai merged commit 0318381 into main Jun 17, 2026
31 checks passed
@jif-oai
jif-oai deleted the jif/skills-service branch June 17, 2026 15:01
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 17, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant