chore: remove unnecessary type checking - #249
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, @Ian2012! What's next?Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review: 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. 🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:Who will review my changes?This repository is currently maintained by Where can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:
When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
pomegranited
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Cool, I guess mypy fixed their bug? Thanks for addressing this issue @Ian2012 :)
- I tested this by:
- Running this change in my tutor dev stack while adding assets to library v2 components
- Ensuring that mypy is checking this file and no longer complains about this issue.
- I read through the code
-
I checked for accessibility issuesN/A -
Includes documentationN/A -
User-facing strings are extracted for translationN/A
kdmccormick
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This would not be the first time that a typing issue went away just by letting mypy or django-stubs get updated. Thanks!
I did not test, but I don't see a need to given that these annotations aren't evaluated at runtime.
Closes: #152