FAL-2076 Cherry-picks #28066 into lilac.master

[pomegranited]

Description

Cherry-picks https://github.com/edx/edx-platform/pull/28066 into open-release/lilac.master.

Testing instructions

• LMS: https://periodic-build-lilac.opencraft.hosting/
• Studio: https://studio.periodic-build-lilac.opencraft.hosting/

(Ocim Admins only)

1. Locate the Active running appserver for the Periodic build Lilac instance via Ocim
2. Visit the Authenticated Link , and append /heartbeat?extended
3. Ensure that the celery check is passing.

Deadline

None

Other information

1. Ordinarily, we'd be able to view the https://periodic-build-lilac.opencraft.hosting/heartbeat?extended to verify that the heartbeat checks are succeeding.

   However, the forum extended check is also failing for lilac.master (and master), and so Ocim redirects to the standard error page instead of showing the healthcheck json. The forum failure will be addressed by https://github.com/edx/configuration/pull/6482.

Reviewer

• @gabor-boros
• @arbrandes

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @pomegranited! I've created OSPR-5928 to keep track of it in JIRA, where we prioritize reviews. Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[natabene]

@pomegranited Thank you for your contribution, do you need an edX reviewer for this?

[pomegranited]

@natabene Nope! @arbrandes can handle this as core committer to lilac.master :)

[gabor-boros]

👍 🎉

The check output was the following which is expected based on the description. It's approved from my side.

{
  "modulestore": {
    "status": true,
    "message": "OK"
  },
  "sql": {
    "status": true,
    "message": "OK"
  },
  "celery": {
    "status": true,
    "message": "{'time': '0.07212519645690918'}"
  },
  "forum": {
    "status": false,
    "message": "Expecting value: line 1 column 1 (char 0)"
  }
}
{"mode":"full","isActive":false}

• I tested what's in the test instructions
• I read through the code

[pomegranited]

Thanks @gabor-boros !
This is ready for your review @arbrandes .

CC @natabene

[arbrandes]

@pomegranited, ACK, adding it to my list.

[arbrandes]

@edx-community-bot merge