feat: REST API for create Library Collection [FC-0062] - #35447
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, @ChrisChV! What's next?Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review: 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. 🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:Who will review my changes?This repository is currently maintained by Where can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:
When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
| openedx-events # Open edX Events from Hooks Extension Framework (OEP-50) | ||
| openedx-filters # Open edX Filters from Hooks Extension Framework (OEP-50) | ||
| openedx-learning # Open edX Learning core (experimental) | ||
| git+https://github.com/open-craft/openedx-learning.git@jill/collection-key#egg=openedx-learning # Open edX Learning core (experimental) |
| # Get the list of collections | ||
| status_cb("Counting collections...") | ||
| num_collections = authoring_api.get_collections().count() | ||
| collections = Collection.objects.filter(enabled=True).select_related("learning_package").order_by('pk') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note: This is also being solved here (#35321) with a different approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes! I think you don't need to worry about it here. cc @pomegranited
| try: | ||
| result = authoring_api.create_collection( | ||
| learning_package_id=library.learning_package_id, | ||
| key=key, | ||
| title=title, | ||
| description=serializer.validated_data['description'], | ||
| created_by=request.user.id, | ||
| ) | ||
| except IntegrityError: | ||
| return Response(status=status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As the user can't directly edit the slug, do you think it is worth an approach like this?
| try: | |
| result = authoring_api.create_collection( | |
| learning_package_id=library.learning_package_id, | |
| key=key, | |
| title=title, | |
| description=serializer.validated_data['description'], | |
| created_by=request.user.id, | |
| ) | |
| except IntegrityError: | |
| return Response(status=status.HTTP_409_CONFLICT) | |
| attempt = 0 | |
| result = None | |
| while not result: | |
| modified_key = key if attempt = 0 else key + str(attempt) | |
| try: | |
| result = authoring_api.create_collection( | |
| learning_package_id=library.learning_package_id, | |
| key=modified_key, | |
| title=title, | |
| description=serializer.validated_data['description'], | |
| created_by=request.user.id, | |
| ) | |
| except IntegrityError: | |
| attempt += 1 |
| # Rename collection.key to "slug" because "key" is a reserved prop name in React | ||
| slug = serializers.CharField(read_only=True) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we plan to change it in the model?
Also, this is not being returned from the rest call.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That wasn't my plan. I've already updated the code to return the slug in the response: 817e3b4
…on create collection API view
|
Closed in flavor of open-craft#683 |
Description
Supporting information
Testing instructions