Skip to content

OCPNODE-3121: Make FeatureGateImageVolume TechPreview#2403

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
bitoku:image-volume
Jul 23, 2025
Merged

OCPNODE-3121: Make FeatureGateImageVolume TechPreview#2403
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
bitoku:image-volume

Conversation

@bitoku
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@bitoku bitoku commented Jul 15, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 15, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 15, 2025

@bitoku: This pull request references OCPNODE-3121 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

This PR graduates ImageVolume featuregate to GA.

upstream:

downstream:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Hello @bitoku! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 15, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from JoelSpeed and deads2k July 15, 2025 10:56
@bitoku bitoku changed the title OCPNODE-3121: Enable FeatureGateImageVolume by default. WIP: OCPNODE-3121: Enable FeatureGateImageVolume by default. Jul 15, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 15, 2025
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR graduates ImageVolume featuregate to GA.

Since this is an upstream gate, can you confirm the lifecycle of the gate? When did it get enabled by default in upstream?

@bitoku
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

bitoku commented Jul 15, 2025

@JoelSpeed It's beta and disabled by default right now.
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/130135/files#diff-530f68e01a51f788bd0ad558bde87a4a378bd3e40e3811d097029f6aa109c7a7

However, our team decided to graduate this feature to GA in 4.20.
https://github.com/openshift/enhancements/blob/master/enhancements/kubelet/oci-image-volume.md#risks-and-mitigations

For OCP, there is a risk to enable the feature gate which is off by default in Kubernetes. The mitigation is:
CRI API is easier to change if needed since it's internal to the implementation
The Kubernetes API for this feature is unlikely to change as it's already in beta and is built on a very stable volume API

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I think the first step of getting this feature promoted to GA would be to get it enabled and running in CI in TechPreview clusters. This will allow us to see how it behaves in OpenShift and I assume, run upstream E2E tests to build a baseline for feature regression.

Can we start with tech preview?

Also, you'll need to run the update-payload-featuregates script in the hack directory to have any effect on the payload (this is why verify is failing)

@bitoku bitoku changed the title WIP: OCPNODE-3121: Enable FeatureGateImageVolume by default. OCPNODE-3121: Enable FeatureGateImageVolume by default. Jul 15, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 15, 2025
@bitoku bitoku changed the title OCPNODE-3121: Enable FeatureGateImageVolume by default. OCPNODE-3121: Make FeatureGateImageVolume TechPreview Jul 15, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 15, 2025

@bitoku: This pull request references OCPNODE-3121 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

This PR graduates ImageVolume featuregate to TechPreview.

upstream:

downstream:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

/assign @haircommander

Peter, are you happy with the plan suggested above of enabling this in TP and gathering test data before we promote?

Also, wanted to check you're ok with the gate being tagged to your handle?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 15, 2025
@bitoku
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

bitoku commented Jul 15, 2025

I put Peter because https://github.com/openshift/api?tab=readme-ov-file#adding-new-techpreview-featuregate-to-all-clusterprofiles-hypershift-and-selfmanaged says "my-team-lead".
If it's ok, I don't mind putting myself.

@bitoku
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

bitoku commented Jul 15, 2025

@JoelSpeed

I think the first step of getting this feature promoted to GA would be to get it enabled and running in CI in TechPreview clusters.

You mean make it TechPreview internally and then once we run enough CI to graduate, make it GA for 4.20, right?

@haircommander
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

TP to gather feedback works for me

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 15, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 15, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bitoku, haircommander, JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@bitoku
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

bitoku commented Jul 15, 2025

/retest

@haircommander
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e375905 and 2 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

3 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e375905 and 2 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e375905 and 2 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e375905 and 2 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

Known issue with KAS on upgrades at the moment

/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 17, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

Known issue with KAS on upgrades at the moment

/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 933316e and 2 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ba53b2a and 2 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-2of2

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/override ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 18, 2025

@saschagrunert: saschagrunert unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file, and the following github teams:openshift: openshift-release-oversight openshift-staff-engineers.

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/override ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 18, 2025

@JoelSpeed: Overrode contexts on behalf of JoelSpeed: ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/minor-e2e-upgrade-minor

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 87ff3fc and 1 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 2562429 and 0 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/hold

Revision affbfc1 was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 18, 2025
@saschagrunert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/test e2e-aws-serial-techpreview-1of2

Test failures seem not related.

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 21, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD fed56f2 and 2 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 5205e27 and 1 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 5205e27 and 2 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD bc3bc48 and 1 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@haircommander
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 23, 2025

@bitoku: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn affbfc1 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 0528f2f and 0 for PR HEAD affbfc1 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit c368740 into openshift:master Jul 23, 2025
27 checks passed
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-cluster-config-api
This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-config-api-container-v4.20.0-202507230546.p0.gc368740.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants