OCPBUGS-65476: Add openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to ClusterO… by davidesalerno · Pull Request #1313 · openshift/cluster-ingress-operator

davidesalerno · 2025-11-28T15:39:12Z

…perator relatedObjects

This change adds the openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to the ClusterOperator relatedObjects

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-11-28T15:39:18Z

@davidesalerno: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65476, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

…perator relatedObjects

This change adds the openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to the ClusterOperator relatedObjects

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

davidesalerno · 2025-12-01T11:13:36Z

/retest-required

grzpiotrowski · 2025-12-03T15:52:52Z

/assign

openshift-ci · 2025-12-04T13:52:04Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from grzpiotrowski. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Miciah · 2025-12-04T17:33:40Z

+    - group: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
+      name: ingress-operator
+      resource: clusterrolebindings


The name here should match the name in manifests/01-cluster-role-binding.yaml:

Suggested change

- group: rbac.authorization.k8s.io

name: ingress-operator

resource: clusterrolebindings

- group: rbac.authorization.k8s.io

name: openshift-ingress-operator

resource: clusterrolebindings

cluster-ingress-operator/manifests/01-cluster-role-binding.yaml

Lines 2 to 5 in 35b0724

kind: ClusterRoleBinding

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1

metadata:

name: openshift-ingress-operator

Maybe you were looking at the rolebinding's name? We should probably include these too:

cluster-ingress-operator/manifests/01-role-binding.yaml

Lines 2 to 6 in 35b0724

kind: RoleBinding

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1

metadata:

name: ingress-operator

namespace: openshift-ingress-operator

cluster-ingress-operator/manifests/01-role-binding.yaml

Lines 23 to 27 in 35b0724

kind: RoleBinding

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1

metadata:

name: ingress-operator

namespace: openshift-config

...and then we might as well include the roles as well:

cluster-ingress-operator/manifests/01-role.yaml

Lines 2 to 6 in 35b0724

kind: Role

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1

metadata:

name: ingress-operator

namespace: openshift-ingress-operator

cluster-ingress-operator/manifests/01-role.yaml

Lines 43 to 47 in 35b0724

kind: Role

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1

metadata:

name: ingress-operator

namespace: openshift-config

@Miciah I updated the code accordingly and in particular:

fixed ClusterRole name

added the Roles and RolesBinding

Miciah · 2025-12-04T17:42:40Z

As we discussed, it would also make sense to get the cluster ingress config and copy entries from Ingress.status.componentRoutes.relatedObjects to ClusterOperator.status.relatedObjects in Reconcile.

I updated the controller with the requested change.

davidesalerno · 2025-12-10T09:13:49Z

/test all

davidesalerno · 2026-01-19T15:30:55Z

/retest-required

grzpiotrowski

/lgtm

@Miciah would you like to have another look since the last comments?

davidesalerno · 2026-02-12T15:29:56Z

/retest-required

rikatz · 2026-02-25T13:47:45Z

/retest-required

lihongan · 2026-02-26T03:17:40Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-02-26T03:17:44Z

@lihongan: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65476, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

lihongan · 2026-02-26T03:18:36Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-02-26T03:18:44Z

@lihongan: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65476, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @melvinjoseph86

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

lihongan · 2026-02-26T03:19:03Z

/retest-required

lihongan · 2026-02-26T07:24:46Z

One e2e test is failing

FAIL: TestAll/serial/TestClusterOperatorStatusRelatedObjects

melvinjoseph86 · 2026-03-02T08:58:52Z

➜  oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                                                AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.22.0-0-2026-03-02-061505-test-ci-ln-rmxzypb-latest   True        False         104m    Cluster version is 4.22.0-0-2026-03-02-061505-test-ci-ln-rmxzypb-latest

➜  oc adm inspect clusteroperator/ingress
Gathering data for ns/openshift-ingress-operator...
Warning: apps.openshift.io/v1 DeploymentConfig is deprecated in v4.14+, unavailable in v4.10000+
Warning: v1 Endpoints is deprecated in v1.33+; use discovery.k8s.io/v1 EndpointSlice
Gathering data for ns/openshift-ingress...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-ingress-canary...
Wrote inspect data to inspect.local.852661774645648715.
➜  ls inspect.local.*/cluster-scoped-resources/
config.openshift.io       operator.openshift.io     rbac.authorization.k8s.io

➜  oc get clusteroperator ingress -o json| jq -c '.status.relatedObjects[]' | grep clusterroles
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"clusterroles"}

➜  oc get clusteroperator ingress -o json| jq -c '.status.relatedObjects[]' | grep clusterrolebindings
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"clusterrolebindings"}
➜  oc get clusteroperator ingress -o json| jq -c '.status.relatedObjects[]' | grep roles              
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"clusterroles"}
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"ingress-operator","namespace":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"roles"}
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"ingress-operator","namespace":"openshift-config","resource":"roles"}
➜  oc get clusteroperator ingress -o json| jq -c '.status.relatedObjects[]' | grep rolebindings
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"clusterrolebindings"}
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"ingress-operator","namespace":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"rolebindings"}
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"ingress-operator","namespace":"openshift-config","resource":"rolebindings"}

Hence marking as verified
/verified by @melvinjoseph86

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-03-02T08:59:03Z

@melvinjoseph86: This PR has been marked as verified by @melvinjoseph86.

Details

In response to this:

➜  oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                                                AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.22.0-0-2026-03-02-061505-test-ci-ln-rmxzypb-latest   True        False         104m    Cluster version is 4.22.0-0-2026-03-02-061505-test-ci-ln-rmxzypb-latest

➜  oc adm inspect clusteroperator/ingress
Gathering data for ns/openshift-ingress-operator...
Warning: apps.openshift.io/v1 DeploymentConfig is deprecated in v4.14+, unavailable in v4.10000+
Warning: v1 Endpoints is deprecated in v1.33+; use discovery.k8s.io/v1 EndpointSlice
Gathering data for ns/openshift-ingress...
Gathering data for ns/openshift-ingress-canary...
Wrote inspect data to inspect.local.852661774645648715.
➜  ls inspect.local.*/cluster-scoped-resources/
config.openshift.io       operator.openshift.io     rbac.authorization.k8s.io

➜  oc get clusteroperator ingress -o json| jq -c '.status.relatedObjects[]' | grep clusterroles
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"clusterroles"}

➜  oc get clusteroperator ingress -o json| jq -c '.status.relatedObjects[]' | grep clusterrolebindings
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"clusterrolebindings"}
➜  oc get clusteroperator ingress -o json| jq -c '.status.relatedObjects[]' | grep roles              
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"clusterroles"}
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"ingress-operator","namespace":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"roles"}
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"ingress-operator","namespace":"openshift-config","resource":"roles"}
➜  oc get clusteroperator ingress -o json| jq -c '.status.relatedObjects[]' | grep rolebindings
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"clusterrolebindings"}
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"ingress-operator","namespace":"openshift-ingress-operator","resource":"rolebindings"}
{"group":"rbac.authorization.k8s.io","name":"ingress-operator","namespace":"openshift-config","resource":"rolebindings"}

Hence marking as verified
/verified by @melvinjoseph86

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

melvinjoseph86 · 2026-03-02T08:59:26Z

/retest

melvinjoseph86 · 2026-03-12T12:24:05Z

/retest-required

openshift-merge-robot · 2026-03-12T12:24:15Z

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

…perator relatedObjects Signed-off-by: Davide Salerno <dsalerno@redhat.com>

openshift-ci · 2026-03-24T15:53:25Z

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

coderabbitai · 2026-03-24T15:53:41Z

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This change extends the ingress cluster operator's status reporting to include RBAC-related objects in the status.relatedObjects list. The controller logic is updated to fetch the default ingress configuration and populate ingress component routes status. A deduplication helper is introduced to prevent duplicate object references. The manifest declaration and end-to-end tests are updated to verify that cluster-scoped and namespaced RBAC resources (clusterroles, clusterrolebindings, roles, and rolebindings) are properly tracked in the operator's status.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

coderabbitai

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@pkg/operator/controller/status/controller.go`:
- Around line 490-497: Reconcile reads configv1.Ingress.status.componentRoutes
but New() doesn't watch Ingress, causing stale relatedObjects; update the
controller setup in New() to add a watch for configv1.Ingress so ingress status
changes trigger reconciles. Concretely, import configv1 and call
builder.Watches(&source.Kind{Type: &configv1.Ingress{}},
handler.EnqueueRequestsFromMapFunc(<map func that maps the Ingress event to the
primary resource this controller manages>)) or an appropriate handler (e.g.,
EnqueueRequestsForOwner/EnqueueRequestsForObject) so updates to
Ingress.status.ComponentRoutes cause the controller (the one constructed in
New()) to reconcile and refresh state.IngressComponentRoutesStatus.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7a057001-6a81-473b-8cdd-3ee1ba7ddd44

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dd97cd3 and 2ba8ac3.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

manifests/03-cluster-operator.yaml
pkg/operator/controller/status/controller.go
test/e2e/operator_test.go

coderabbitai · 2026-03-24T15:58:38Z

+	ingressConfig := &configv1.Ingress{}
+	if err := r.client.Get(ctx, operatorcontroller.IngressClusterConfigName(), ingressConfig); err != nil {
+		if !errors.IsNotFound(err) {
+			return state, fmt.Errorf("failed to get default ingress: %v", err)
+		}
+	} else {
+		state.IngressComponentRoutesStatus = ingressConfig.Status.ComponentRoutes
+	}


⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Add a watch for configv1.Ingress to avoid stale relatedObjects

Line [490] makes reconcile depend on Ingress.status.componentRoutes, but New() does not watch configv1.Ingress. Updates to component routes may not propagate until an unrelated event triggers reconcile.

Proposed fix

@@ if err := c.Watch(source.Kind[client.Object](operatorCache, &configv1.ClusterOperator{}, handler.EnqueueRequestsFromMapFunc(toDefaultIngressController), predicate.NewPredicateFuncs(isIngressClusterOperator))); err != nil { return nil, err } + + isClusterIngressConfig := predicate.NewPredicateFuncs(func(o client.Object) bool { + return o.GetName() == operatorcontroller.IngressClusterConfigName().Name + }) + if err := c.Watch(source.Kind[client.Object]( + operatorCache, + &configv1.Ingress{}, + handler.EnqueueRequestsFromMapFunc(toDefaultIngressController), + isClusterIngressConfig, + )); err != nil { + return nil, err + }

As per coding guidelines, "Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity."

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

ingressConfig := &configv1.Ingress{}

if err := r.client.Get(ctx, operatorcontroller.IngressClusterConfigName(), ingressConfig); err != nil {

if !errors.IsNotFound(err) {

return state, fmt.Errorf("failed to get default ingress: %v", err)

}

} else {

state.IngressComponentRoutesStatus = ingressConfig.Status.ComponentRoutes

}

if err := c.Watch(source.Kind[client.Object](operatorCache, &configv1.ClusterOperator{}, handler.EnqueueRequestsFromMapFunc(toDefaultIngressController), predicate.NewPredicateFuncs(isIngressClusterOperator))); err != nil {

return nil, err

}

isClusterIngressConfig := predicate.NewPredicateFuncs(func(o client.Object) bool {

return o.GetName() == operatorcontroller.IngressClusterConfigName().Name

})

if err := c.Watch(source.Kind[client.Object](

operatorCache,

&configv1.Ingress{},

handler.EnqueueRequestsFromMapFunc(toDefaultIngressController),

isClusterIngressConfig,

)); err != nil {

return nil, err

}

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@pkg/operator/controller/status/controller.go` around lines 490 - 497, Reconcile reads configv1.Ingress.status.componentRoutes but New() doesn't watch Ingress, causing stale relatedObjects; update the controller setup in New() to add a watch for configv1.Ingress so ingress status changes trigger reconciles. Concretely, import configv1 and call builder.Watches(&source.Kind{Type: &configv1.Ingress{}}, handler.EnqueueRequestsFromMapFunc(<map func that maps the Ingress event to the primary resource this controller manages>)) or an appropriate handler (e.g., EnqueueRequestsForOwner/EnqueueRequestsForObject) so updates to Ingress.status.ComponentRoutes cause the controller (the one constructed in New()) to reconcile and refresh state.IngressComponentRoutesStatus.

openshift-ci · 2026-03-24T19:24:27Z

@davidesalerno: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-pre-release-ossm	`4303bbd`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-pre-release-ossm`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator	`2ba8ac3`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-operator`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance	`2ba8ac3`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift-conformance`
ci/prow/e2e-azure-operator	`2ba8ac3`	link	true	`/test e2e-azure-operator`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-operator	`2ba8ac3`	link	true	`/test e2e-gcp-operator`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

davidesalerno changed the title ~~OCPBUGS-65476: Add openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to ClusterO…~~ [WIP] OCPBUGS-65476: Add openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to ClusterO… Nov 28, 2025

openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 28, 2025

openshift-ci Bot requested review from frobware and knobunc November 28, 2025 15:39

davidesalerno force-pushed the ocpbugs65476 branch from 14bb378 to 21827f4 Compare November 28, 2025 16:15

davidesalerno force-pushed the ocpbugs65476 branch from 21827f4 to 103253e Compare December 2, 2025 09:11

davidesalerno changed the title ~~[WIP] OCPBUGS-65476: Add openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to ClusterO…~~ OCPBUGS-65476: Add openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to ClusterO… Dec 2, 2025

openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 2, 2025

openshift-ci Bot assigned grzpiotrowski Dec 3, 2025

davidesalerno force-pushed the ocpbugs65476 branch from 103253e to 35b0724 Compare December 4, 2025 13:46

Miciah reviewed Dec 4, 2025

View reviewed changes

davidesalerno changed the title ~~OCPBUGS-65476: Add openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to ClusterO…~~ [WIP] OCPBUGS-65476: Add openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to ClusterO… Dec 4, 2025

openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 4, 2025

davidesalerno force-pushed the ocpbugs65476 branch 3 times, most recently from d00d433 to 1c93ae3 Compare December 5, 2025 14:04

davidesalerno marked this pull request as draft December 5, 2025 15:10

davidesalerno force-pushed the ocpbugs65476 branch from 1c93ae3 to 56d32cc Compare December 5, 2025 15:45

davidesalerno force-pushed the ocpbugs65476 branch from 56d32cc to 4303bbd Compare December 10, 2025 15:38

davidesalerno changed the title ~~[WIP] OCPBUGS-65476: Add openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to ClusterO…~~ OCPBUGS-65476: Add openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to ClusterO… Dec 10, 2025

davidesalerno marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2025 17:32

grzpiotrowski reviewed Jan 20, 2026

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 20, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 26, 2026

openshift-ci Bot requested a review from melvinjoseph86 February 26, 2026 03:18

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Mar 2, 2026

openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 12, 2026

OCPBUGS-65476: Add openshift-ingress-operator ClusterRole to ClusterO…

2ba8ac3

…perator relatedObjects Signed-off-by: Davide Salerno <dsalerno@redhat.com>

davidesalerno force-pushed the ocpbugs65476 branch from daf3330 to 2ba8ac3 Compare March 24, 2026 15:53

openshift-ci-robot removed the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Mar 24, 2026

openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 24, 2026

openshift-ci Bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 24, 2026

coderabbitai Bot reviewed Mar 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

	kind: ClusterRoleBinding
	apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
	metadata:
	name: openshift-ingress-operator

	kind: RoleBinding
	apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
	metadata:
	name: ingress-operator
	namespace: openshift-ingress-operator

	kind: Role
	apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
	metadata:
	name: ingress-operator
	namespace: openshift-ingress-operator

-	ingressConfig := &configv1.Ingress{}
-	if err := r.client.Get(ctx, operatorcontroller.IngressClusterConfigName(), ingressConfig); err != nil {
-		if !errors.IsNotFound(err) {
-			return state, fmt.Errorf("failed to get default ingress: %v", err)
-		}
-	} else {
-		state.IngressComponentRoutesStatus = ingressConfig.Status.ComponentRoutes
-	}
+	if err := c.Watch(source.Kind[client.Object](operatorCache, &configv1.ClusterOperator{}, handler.EnqueueRequestsFromMapFunc(toDefaultIngressController), predicate.NewPredicateFuncs(isIngressClusterOperator))); err != nil {
+		return nil, err
+	}
+	isClusterIngressConfig := predicate.NewPredicateFuncs(func(o client.Object) bool {
+		return o.GetName() == operatorcontroller.IngressClusterConfigName().Name
+	})
+	if err := c.Watch(source.Kind[client.Object](
+		operatorCache,
+		&configv1.Ingress{},
+		handler.EnqueueRequestsFromMapFunc(toDefaultIngressController),
+		isClusterIngressConfig,
+	)); err != nil {
+		return nil, err
+	}

Conversation

davidesalerno commented Nov 28, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 28, 2025

Uh oh!

davidesalerno commented Dec 1, 2025

Uh oh!

grzpiotrowski commented Dec 3, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 4, 2025

Uh oh!

Miciah Dec 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Miciah Dec 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Miciah Dec 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

davidesalerno Dec 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Miciah Dec 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

davidesalerno Dec 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

davidesalerno commented Dec 10, 2025

Uh oh!

davidesalerno commented Jan 19, 2026

Uh oh!

grzpiotrowski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

davidesalerno commented Feb 12, 2026

Uh oh!

rikatz commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

lihongan commented Feb 26, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 26, 2026

Uh oh!

lihongan commented Feb 26, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 26, 2026

Uh oh!

lihongan commented Feb 26, 2026

Uh oh!

lihongan commented Feb 26, 2026

Uh oh!

melvinjoseph86 commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

melvinjoseph86 commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

melvinjoseph86 commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-robot commented Mar 12, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Walkthrough

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot Mar 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading