OCPBUGS-98719: retry GetVotingMemberNames on transient etcd client fails by IlanZuckerman · Pull Request #31445 · openshift/origin

IlanZuckerman · 2026-07-29T12:03:21Z

GetVotingMemberNames previously failed immediately when NewEtcdClient or MemberList errored, which is flaky during master replacement while etcd is restarting and port-forwards drop.
Poll and retry those transient errors instead of failing the CPMS OnDelete scaling test on the first attempt.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Bug Fixes
- Improved reliability when retrieving etcd voting member information during transient connection failures or restarts.
- Added polling and retry behavior so temporary port-forward or client errors no longer cause immediate failures.

…ilures `GetVotingMemberNames` previously failed immediately when `NewEtcdClient` or `MemberList` errored, which is flaky during master replacement while etcd is restarting and port-forwards drop. Poll and retry those transient errors instead of failing the CPMS OnDelete scaling test on the first attempt.

openshift-merge-bot · 2026-07-29T12:03:24Z

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-07-29T12:03:29Z

@IlanZuckerman: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98719, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

…ilures

GetVotingMemberNames previously failed immediately when NewEtcdClient or MemberList errored, which is flaky during master replacement while etcd is restarting and port-forwards drop.
Poll and retry those transient errors
instead of failing the CPMS OnDelete scaling test on the first attempt.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

coderabbitai · 2026-07-29T12:05:02Z

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: e930b4ae-33d0-48f6-9bf9-97009d8ee6c0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd9cc13 and 4800f55.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

test/extended/etcd/helpers/helpers.go

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

test/extended/etcd/helpers/helpers.go

Walkthrough

GetVotingMemberNames retries etcd client creation and member listing with fresh clients and per-attempt timeouts. It logs transient failures and returns non-learner member names after a successful poll.

Changes

etcd member discovery

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Poll etcd member discovery `test/extended/etcd/helpers/helpers.go`	`GetVotingMemberNames` retries client creation and `MemberList` until success or the polling deadline. It closes each client, logs failures, and returns non-learner member names.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers: hasbro17, tjungblu

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 15

✅ Passed checks (15 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the main change: retrying GetVotingMemberNames after transient etcd client failures.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names	✅ Passed	The PR changes only etcd helper logic and adds no Ginkgo title declarations; existing etcd test titles are static and contain no runtime values.
Test Structure And Quality	✅ Passed	The changed helper uses a 10-minute PollUntilContextTimeout, a 15-second MemberList context, and defers client cleanup per attempt; its caller uses suite setup/cleanup and a wrapped failure message.
Microshift Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	The full PR changes only test/extended/etcd/helpers/helpers.go and adds no new Ginkgo tests, so the MicroShift test compatibility check is not applicable.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	The PR changes only the existing GetVotingMemberNames helper; it adds no Ginkgo e2e tests and introduces no SNO multi-node assumptions.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility	✅ Passed	The PR changes only an etcd test helper, adding retry and timeout logic; it adds no deployment, controller, manifest, or scheduling constraint.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract	✅ Passed	The PR changes only helper timeout handling. It adds no process-level stdout writes, and GetVotingMemberNames is called inside a Ginkgo It block.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	The PR changes only test/extended/etcd/helpers/helpers.go; it adds no Ginkgo test and no IPv4 or external-connectivity requirement.
No-Weak-Crypto	✅ Passed	The PR changes only etcd polling and context handling; the added lines contain no MD5, SHA1, DES, RC4, Blowfish, ECB, custom crypto, or secret comparisons.
Container-Privileges	✅ Passed	The PR changes only Go retry logic in helpers.go; no container/Kubernetes manifests or privilege settings were added.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs	✅ Passed	The existing voting-member-name log is unchanged; new logs report retry status and errors only, with no passwords, tokens, API keys, PII, or customer data.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

IlanZuckerman · 2026-07-29T12:14:31Z

❌ Failed checks (1 error)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ❌ Error GetVotingMemberNames logs the full voting member list, and etcd member names are node names/internal hostnames. Redact the names or log only counts/opaque IDs; avoid printing the member-name list in framework.Logf.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

That log was already there before My PR. The same pattern is used all over these etcd helpers (EnsureVotingMembersCount, EnsureVotingMembersExcluding)

coderabbitai · 2026-07-29T12:15:17Z

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

file="test/extended/etcd/helpers/helpers.go"

echo "== Relevant declarations =="
ast-grep outline "$file" --items all --type function --match 'GetVotingMemberNames|EnsureVotingMembersCount|EnsureVotingMembersExcluding' --view expanded || true

echo
echo "== Relevant log statements and function context on PR branch =="
rg -n -C 8 'func (GetVotingMemberNames|EnsureVotingMembersCount|EnsureVotingMembersExcluding)\b|framework\.Logf' "$file"

echo
echo "== PR merge base and changed hunks =="
base="$(git merge-base HEAD origin/master 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD origin/main 2>/dev/null || true)"
if [ -z "$base" ]; then
  echo "Could not determine merge base against origin/master or origin/main." >&2
  exit 1
fi
echo "Merge base: $base"
git diff --unified=20 "$base"...HEAD -- "$file"

Length of output: 15246

@IlanZuckerman You’re right. I verified the diff against the merge base: Current voting etcd members: %v was already present before this PR and was only moved into the polling callback. The existing etcd helpers also log comparable member details.

This sensitive-log finding is out of scope for this change, so I’m withdrawing it.

✏️ Learnings added

Learnt from: IlanZuckerman
URL: https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/31445

Timestamp: 2026-07-29T12:15:16.291Z
Learning: In `test/extended/etcd/helpers/helpers.go`, etcd test helpers such as `GetVotingMemberNames` and `EnsureVotingMembersExcluding` intentionally log voting-member names and related endpoint details for test diagnostics. When reviewing changes to these helpers, do not flag an existing logging pattern as newly introduced unless the PR adds or expands the sensitive output.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

coderabbitai · 2026-07-29T12:15:26Z

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@IlanZuckerman You’re right—the logged voting-member list was pre-existing and this PR only relocates it into the retry loop. The same diagnostic pattern is already used across the etcd helpers, so this is not a newly introduced sensitive-data regression.

Withdrawing this finding.

coderabbitai · 2026-07-29T12:16:13Z

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@IlanZuckerman You’re right—the voting-member list log was present before this PR and is only relocated into the retry loop. Comparable diagnostic logging already exists in the other etcd helpers, so this change does not introduce or expand sensitive output.

Withdrawing this finding.

openshift-merge-bot · 2026-07-29T12:58:59Z

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

IlanZuckerman · 2026-07-30T07:26:48Z

@IlanZuckerman: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips fd9cc13 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn fd9cc13 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi fd9cc13 link true /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

/retest

IlanZuckerman · 2026-08-02T07:30:25Z

@IlanZuckerman: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98719, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-02T07:30:33Z

@IlanZuckerman: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98719, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (5.0.0) matches configured target version for branch (5.0.0)
bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Details

In response to this:

@IlanZuckerman: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98719, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "5.0.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

IlanZuckerman · 2026-08-02T07:34:33Z

This fix should be back ported to to 4.19 → 4.23. I will do so after the initial CR.

ekuris-redhat

/lgtm

IlanZuckerman · 2026-08-02T08:44:35Z

/jira backport release-4.23,release-4.22,release-4.21,release-4.20,release-4.19

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-02T08:50:26Z

@IlanZuckerman: The following backport issues have been created:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100437 for branch release-4.23
Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100438 for branch release-4.22
Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100439 for branch release-4.21
Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100440 for branch release-4.20
Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100441 for branch release-4.19

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.23
/cherrypick release-4.22
/cherrypick release-4.21
/cherrypick release-4.20
/cherrypick release-4.19

Details

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.23,release-4.22,release-4.21,release-4.20,release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-08-02T08:50:29Z

@openshift-ci-robot: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.19, release-4.20, release-4.21, release-4.22, release-4.23 in new PRs and assign them to you.

Details

In response to this:

@IlanZuckerman: The following backport issues have been created:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100437 for branch release-4.23

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100438 for branch release-4.22

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100439 for branch release-4.21

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100440 for branch release-4.20

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100441 for branch release-4.19

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.23
/cherrypick release-4.22
/cherrypick release-4.21
/cherrypick release-4.20
/cherrypick release-4.19

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.23,release-4.22,release-4.21,release-4.20,release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

IlanZuckerman · 2026-08-03T06:02:19Z

/assign @dusk125
@dusk125 PTAL for /approve — already has /lgtm and green CI.

gryf

/lgtm
/approve

openshift-merge-bot · 2026-08-03T08:22:57Z

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

IlanZuckerman · 2026-08-03T13:17:56Z

@IlanZuckerman: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift 4800f55 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn 4800f55 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade 4800f55 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

/retest

IlanZuckerman · 2026-08-05T05:46:13Z

/assign @hasbro17 @tjungblu @jubittajohn
Still need /approve from test/extended/etcd OWNERS. already has /lgtm.
@dusk125 @hasbro17 @tjungblu PTAL when you can.

IlanZuckerman · 2026-08-05T06:46:50Z

/verified by CI

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-05T06:47:02Z

@IlanZuckerman: This PR has been marked as verified by CI.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by CI

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

hasbro17 · 2026-08-11T20:07:32Z

/approve

openshift-ci · 2026-08-11T20:08:30Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ekuris-redhat, gryf, hasbro17, IlanZuckerman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~test/extended/etcd/OWNERS~~ [hasbro17]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-merge-bot · 2026-08-11T22:17:32Z

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

openshift-merge-bot · 2026-08-11T23:24:53Z

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 50d8dd2 and 2 for PR HEAD 4800f55 in total

IlanZuckerman · 2026-08-12T05:28:12Z

@IlanZuckerman: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn 4800f55 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

/retest

openshift-ci · 2026-08-12T09:28:53Z

@IlanZuckerman: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-12T09:34:11Z

@IlanZuckerman: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98719
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-98719 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

GetVotingMemberNames previously failed immediately when NewEtcdClient or MemberList errored, which is flaky during master replacement while etcd is restarting and port-forwards drop.
Poll and retry those transient errors instead of failing the CPMS OnDelete scaling test on the first attempt.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Bug Fixes

Improved reliability when retrieving etcd voting member information during transient connection failures or restarts.

Added polling and retry behavior so temporary port-forward or client errors no longer cause immediate failures.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-08-12T09:37:16Z

@openshift-ci-robot: #31445 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.23":

Applying: OCPBUGS-98719: retry GetVotingMemberNames on transient etcd client failures
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	test/extended/etcd/helpers/helpers.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging test/extended/etcd/helpers/helpers.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/extended/etcd/helpers/helpers.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config set advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 OCPBUGS-98719: retry GetVotingMemberNames on transient etcd client failures

Details

In response to this:

@IlanZuckerman: The following backport issues have been created:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100437 for branch release-4.23

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100438 for branch release-4.22

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100439 for branch release-4.21

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100440 for branch release-4.20

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100441 for branch release-4.19

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.23
/cherrypick release-4.22
/cherrypick release-4.21
/cherrypick release-4.20
/cherrypick release-4.19

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.23,release-4.22,release-4.21,release-4.20,release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-08-12T09:38:06Z

@openshift-ci-robot: new pull request created: #31506

Details

In response to this:

@IlanZuckerman: The following backport issues have been created:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100437 for branch release-4.23

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100438 for branch release-4.22

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100439 for branch release-4.21

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100440 for branch release-4.20

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100441 for branch release-4.19

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.23
/cherrypick release-4.22
/cherrypick release-4.21
/cherrypick release-4.20
/cherrypick release-4.19

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.23,release-4.22,release-4.21,release-4.20,release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-08-12T09:38:57Z

@openshift-ci-robot: new pull request created: #31507

Details

In response to this:

@IlanZuckerman: The following backport issues have been created:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100437 for branch release-4.23

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100438 for branch release-4.22

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100439 for branch release-4.21

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100440 for branch release-4.20

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100441 for branch release-4.19

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.23
/cherrypick release-4.22
/cherrypick release-4.21
/cherrypick release-4.20
/cherrypick release-4.19

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.23,release-4.22,release-4.21,release-4.20,release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-08-12T09:39:46Z

@openshift-ci-robot: new pull request created: #31508

Details

In response to this:

@IlanZuckerman: The following backport issues have been created:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100437 for branch release-4.23

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100438 for branch release-4.22

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100439 for branch release-4.21

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100440 for branch release-4.20

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100441 for branch release-4.19

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.23
/cherrypick release-4.22
/cherrypick release-4.21
/cherrypick release-4.20
/cherrypick release-4.19

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.23,release-4.22,release-4.21,release-4.20,release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2026-08-12T09:40:38Z

@openshift-ci-robot: new pull request created: #31509

Details

In response to this:

@IlanZuckerman: The following backport issues have been created:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100437 for branch release-4.23

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100438 for branch release-4.22

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100439 for branch release-4.21

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100440 for branch release-4.20

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-100441 for branch release-4.19

Queuing cherrypicks to the requested branches to be created after this PR merges:
/cherrypick release-4.23
/cherrypick release-4.22
/cherrypick release-4.21
/cherrypick release-4.20
/cherrypick release-4.19

In response to this:

/jira backport release-4.23,release-4.22,release-4.21,release-4.20,release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

IlanZuckerman changed the title ~~OCPBUGS-98719: retry GetVotingMemberNames on transient etcd client fa…~~ OCPBUGS-98719: retry GetVotingMemberNames on transient etcd client fails Jul 29, 2026

openshift-ci Bot requested review from hasbro17 and tjungblu July 29, 2026 12:04

tjungblu mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2026

[Auto-Generated] Personal Workflow Brief tjungblu/agent#5

Open

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 2, 2026

ekuris-redhat approved these changes Aug 2, 2026

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot assigned ekuris-redhat Aug 2, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 2, 2026

openshift-ci Bot assigned dusk125 Aug 3, 2026

gryf approved these changes Aug 3, 2026

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot assigned gryf Aug 3, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 3, 2026

openshift-ci Bot assigned hasbro17, jubittajohn and tjungblu Aug 5, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Aug 5, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 11, 2026

openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit ad1e76c into openshift:main Aug 12, 2026
22 checks passed

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2026

[release-4.22] OCPBUGS-100438: retry GetVotingMemberNames on transient etcd client fails #31506

Open

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Aug 12, 2026

[release-4.21] OCPBUGS-100439: retry GetVotingMemberNames on transient etcd client fails #31507

Open

This was referenced Aug 12, 2026

[release-4.20] OCPBUGS-100440: retry GetVotingMemberNames on transient etcd client fails #31508

Open

[release-4.19] OCPBUGS-100441: retry GetVotingMemberNames on transient etcd client fails #31509

Open

Uh oh!

Conversation

IlanZuckerman commented Jul 29, 2026 • edited by coderabbitai Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary by CodeRabbit

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-bot Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Walkthrough

Changes

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Jul 29, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

❌ Failed checks (1 error)

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-bot Bot commented Jul 29, 2026

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Jul 30, 2026

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Aug 2, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 2, 2026

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Aug 2, 2026

Uh oh!

ekuris-redhat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Aug 2, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 2, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Aug 2, 2026

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

gryf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-bot Bot commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Aug 3, 2026

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Aug 5, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 5, 2026

Uh oh!

hasbro17 commented Aug 11, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-bot Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-bot Bot commented Aug 11, 2026

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Aug 12, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Aug 12, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 12, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Aug 12, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Aug 12, 2026

Uh oh!

IlanZuckerman commented Jul 29, 2026 •

edited by coderabbitai Bot

Loading

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

IlanZuckerman commented Jul 29, 2026 •

edited

Loading

IlanZuckerman commented Aug 5, 2026 •

edited

Loading