Skip to content

treewide: musl-fts is only needed when using MUSL#29752

Open
pprindeville wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:masterfrom
pprindeville:fix-musl-fts-dependencies
Open

treewide: musl-fts is only needed when using MUSL#29752
pprindeville wants to merge 1 commit into
openwrt:masterfrom
pprindeville:fix-musl-fts-dependencies

Conversation

@pprindeville

@pprindeville pprindeville commented Jun 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

📦 Package Details

Maintainer: @BKPepe

Description:
Two packages (fluent-bit and nnn) don't properly gate musl-fts as only required when using MUSL.


🧪 Run Testing Details

  • OpenWrt Version: HEAD
  • OpenWrt Target/Subtarget: mediatek/filogic
  • OpenWrt Device: bananapi_bpi-r4-pro-8x

✅ Formalities

  • I have reviewed the [CONTRIBUTING.md]

Two packages (fluent-bit and nnn) don't properly gate musl-fts as
only required when using MUSL.

Signed-off-by: Philip A. Prindeville <philipp@redfish-solutions.com>
@pprindeville

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@GeorgeSapkin: Can I go ahead and merge this? Still not sure why some platforms always fail and others always succeed... Is it still the test-version.sh thing?

@GeorgeSapkin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Can I go ahead and merge this?

fluent-bit segfaults in CI tests 1:

fluent-bit: [pass] File /usr/sbin/fluent-bit is executable
Segmentation fault
Segmentation fault
Segmentation fault
Segmentation fault
Segmentation fault
Segmentation fault
Segmentation fault
fluent-bit: [warn] Version check (/usr/sbin/fluent-bit)

Still not sure why some platforms always fail and others always succeed... Is it still the test-version.sh thing?

Not all platforms run these tests.

Footnotes

  1. https://github.com/openwrt/packages/actions/runs/27513679091/job/81325367759?pr=29752#step:17:158

@pprindeville

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@GeorgeSapkin: Thanks. Is there an overview on checking out the tests and running them locally in your cloning?

@pprindeville pprindeville force-pushed the fix-musl-fts-dependencies branch 2 times, most recently from 72fde97 to 13f2693 Compare June 18, 2026 23:37
@pprindeville

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Unmodified the package is segfaulting, so this is unrelated to my changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants