Skip to content

Add Claude Code GitHub Workflow - #158

Merged
tinovyatkin merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
add-claude-github-actions-1784710385426
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

Add Claude Code GitHub Workflow#158
tinovyatkin merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
add-claude-github-actions-1784710385426

Conversation

@tinovyatkin

@tinovyatkin tinovyatkin commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 Installing Claude Code GitHub App

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow that enables Claude Code integration in our repository.

What is Claude Code?

Claude Code is an AI coding agent that can help with:

  • Bug fixes and improvements
  • Documentation updates
  • Implementing new features
  • Code reviews and suggestions
  • Writing tests
  • And more!

How it works

Once this PR is merged, we'll be able to interact with Claude by mentioning @claude in a pull request or issue comment.
Once the workflow is triggered, Claude will analyze the comment and surrounding context, and execute on the request in a GitHub action.

Important Notes

  • This workflow won't take effect until this PR is merged
  • @claude mentions won't work until after the merge is complete
  • The workflow runs automatically whenever Claude is mentioned in PR or issue comments
  • Claude gets access to the entire PR or issue context including files, diffs, and previous comments

Security

  • Our Anthropic API key is securely stored as a GitHub Actions secret
  • Only users with write access to the repository can trigger the workflow
  • All Claude runs are stored in the GitHub Actions run history
  • Claude's default tools are limited to reading/writing files and interacting with our repo by creating comments, branches, and commits.
  • We can add more allowed tools by adding them to the workflow file like:
allowed_tools: Bash(npm install),Bash(npm run build),Bash(npm run lint),Bash(npm run test)

There's more information in the Claude Code action repo.

After merging this PR, let's try mentioning @claude in a comment on any PR to get started!

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added automated AI-assisted code reviews for pull requests.
    • Added on-demand AI assistance for issues, pull request reviews, and review comments when requested.
    • Enabled access to relevant CI results during AI-assisted interactions.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 22, 2026 08:53
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Caution

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub has been sunset. All code review activity has officially ceased.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds two GitHub Actions workflows that invoke Claude Code for selected pull request events and for issue or review interactions containing @claude.

Changes

Claude automation

Layer / File(s) Summary
Pull request review workflow
.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml
Runs Claude Code on selected pull request events with repository permissions, checkout, OAuth authentication, configured plugins, and a prompt referencing the current pull request.
Mention-triggered Claude workflow
.github/workflows/claude.yml
Runs Claude Code for supported issue, pull request review, and comment events when @claude is present, with checkout, permissions, OAuth authentication, and optional configuration comments.

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers: copilot

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: adding Claude Code GitHub workflows.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch add-claude-github-actions-1784710385426

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📊 Source Code Metrics (this PR vs main)

No metric changes detected.

Generated by mehen v1.6.0 — the code quality watcher.

@tinovyatkin
tinovyatkin merged commit bf2554b into main Jul 22, 2026
11 of 13 checks passed
@tinovyatkin
tinovyatkin deleted the add-claude-github-actions-1784710385426 branch July 22, 2026 08:54

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds GitHub Actions workflows to integrate the Anthropic Claude Code agent into this repository, enabling automated Claude runs based on mentions/events and an optional automated PR code-review job.

Changes:

  • Adds a Claude Code workflow triggered by comment/review events (and issue events) that runs anthropics/claude-code-action.
  • Adds a Claude Code Review workflow that runs the same action on PR lifecycle events with a code-review plugin prompt.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 6 comments.

File Description
.github/workflows/claude.yml New workflow to invoke Claude Code when @claude appears in comments/reviews/issues.
.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml New workflow to invoke an automated Claude-driven PR code review on PR events.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +8 to +9
issues:
types: [opened, assigned]
Comment on lines +15 to +19
if: |
(github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && contains(github.event.comment.body, '@claude')) ||
(github.event_name == 'pull_request_review_comment' && contains(github.event.comment.body, '@claude')) ||
(github.event_name == 'pull_request_review' && contains(github.event.review.body, '@claude')) ||
(github.event_name == 'issues' && (contains(github.event.issue.body, '@claude') || contains(github.event.issue.title, '@claude')))
Comment on lines +21 to +26
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: read
issues: read
id-token: write
actions: read # Required for Claude to read CI results on PRs
Comment on lines +29 to +35
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 1

- name: Run Claude Code
id: claude
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
Comment on lines +21 to +27
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: read
issues: read
id-token: write

Comment on lines +34 to +37
- name: Run Claude Code Review
id: claude-review
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml:
- Around line 29-36: Pin the actions/checkout and anthropics/claude-code-action
references to immutable commit SHAs in both
.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml lines 29-36 and
.github/workflows/claude.yml lines 28-35, replacing the mutable v4 and v1 tags
while preserving the existing action configuration.
- Around line 3-5: Add a workflow-level concurrency configuration alongside the
pull_request trigger, using a pull-request-specific group and enabling
cancel-in-progress so newer synchronize runs cancel older Claude review runs.
Keep the existing trigger types unchanged.
- Around line 36-41: Update the Claude Code action configuration to append
--comment to the prompt and configure claude_args to pass the GitHub CLI and
inline-comment tools, ensuring the code-review command posts review comments on
the pull request instead of only printing output.
- Around line 22-26: Update the permissions for the workflow at
.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml, lines 22-26, to grant contents,
pull-requests, and issues write access while retaining id-token write. Apply the
same write scopes in .github/workflows/claude.yml, lines 21-26, and preserve
actions read there for CI-result access.

In @.github/workflows/claude.yml:
- Around line 8-19: Remove assigned from the issues.types list in the workflow
trigger, leaving only opened so unrelated issue reassignment cannot rerun the
claude job. Do not change the existing job conditions or other event triggers.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c9f59661-5d7f-4e17-a016-1293312ae12e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e9e728 and 9e47ecb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml
  • .github/workflows/claude.yml

Comment on lines +3 to +5
on:
pull_request:
types: [opened, synchronize, ready_for_review, reopened]

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🩺 Stability & Availability | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

printf 'Files:\n'
git ls-files '.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml' || true

printf '\nLine-numbered contents:\n'
cat -n .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml

printf '\nWorkflow outline (if supported):\n'
ast-grep outline .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml 2>/dev/null || true

Repository: ophi-dev/antlr-rust-runtime

Length of output: 2068


Cancel stale reviews per pull request. Add a workflow-level concurrency group with cancel-in-progress: true so newer synchronize runs replace older Claude review runs and avoid stale duplicate comments.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)

🪛 zizmor (1.26.1)

[warning] 3-11: insufficient job-level concurrency limits (concurrency-limits): workflow is missing concurrency setting

(concurrency-limits)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml around lines 3 - 5, Add a
workflow-level concurrency configuration alongside the pull_request trigger,
using a pull-request-specific group and enabling cancel-in-progress so newer
synchronize runs cancel older Claude review runs. Keep the existing trigger
types unchanged.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

Comment on lines +22 to +26
permissions:
contents: read
pull-requests: read
issues: read
id-token: write

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

printf '\n== Files ==\n'
git ls-files '.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml' '.github/workflows/claude.yml' || true

printf '\n== claude-code-review.yml ==\n'
cat -n .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml

printf '\n== claude.yml ==\n'
cat -n .github/workflows/claude.yml

printf '\n== Search for workflow/action usage ==\n'
rg -n "pull-requests:|issues:|actions:|anthropic|claude|checkout@" .github/workflows .github -g '*.yml' -g '*.yaml' || true

Repository: ophi-dev/antlr-rust-runtime

Length of output: 12325


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "hello"

Repository: ophi-dev/antlr-rust-runtime

Length of output: 171


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
sed -n '1,220p' .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml
printf '\n---\n'
sed -n '1,220p' .github/workflows/claude.yml

Repository: ophi-dev/antlr-rust-runtime

Length of output: 3489


🌐 Web query:

anthropics/claude-code-action workflow permissions pull-requests issues write GITHUB_TOKEN OAuth token comments documentation

💡 Result:

To use the anthropics/claude-code-action, you must configure specific GitHub workflow permissions and authentication to enable the action to interact with your repository. Required Workflow Permissions In your GitHub Actions workflow YAML file, you must explicitly define the following permissions to allow the action to read and write to your repository [1][2]: permissions: contents: write pull-requests: write issues: write id-token: write # Required for OIDC authentication to the Claude GitHub App If you need Claude to access workflow runs, job logs, or test results, you must also add actions: read to these permissions [2][3]. Authentication and OAuth Tokens The claude-code-action typically uses the Claude GitHub App [1][4]. The action uses OpenID Connect (OIDC) to exchange an identity token for an app token, which is why id-token: write is mandatory [2][5]. If you choose not to use the official GitHub App or need to override the default behavior, you can provide your own github_token (such as a Personal Access Token or a custom app token) as an input to the action [2][3]. Note that if you use a custom token, you must ensure it has the necessary contents, pull-requests, and issues write permissions to perform its tasks [1][4]. Security Considerations * Repository Write Access: As a security measure, only users with write access to the repository can trigger the action by default [2][4]. * Bot Triggers: By default, other bots cannot trigger the action. If you need to enable this, you must use the allowed_bots parameter [4]. * Least Privilege: Always specify permissions explicitly in your workflow rather than relying on default settings, and use GitHub Secrets for any sensitive tokens [2]. * Fine-Grained Permissions: For more advanced control within the Claude Code tool itself (not just the GitHub Action), you can manage tool-level permissions using the /permissions command in the Claude Code CLI [6][7].

Citations:


Grant the Claude workflows the write scopes they require.

  • .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml: anthropics/claude-code-action needs contents: write, pull-requests: write, issues: write, and id-token: write; the current read-only scopes will block review/comment creation.
  • .github/workflows/claude.yml: apply the same write scopes; keep actions: read only for CI-result access.
🧰 Tools
🪛 zizmor (1.26.1)

[warning] 24-24: permissions without explanatory comments (undocumented-permissions): needs an explanatory comment

(undocumented-permissions)

📍 Affects 2 files
  • .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml#L22-L26 (this comment)
  • .github/workflows/claude.yml#L21-L26
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml around lines 22 - 26, Update the
permissions for the workflow at .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml, lines
22-26, to grant contents, pull-requests, and issues write access while retaining
id-token write. Apply the same write scopes in .github/workflows/claude.yml,
lines 21-26, and preserve actions read there for CI-result access.

Comment on lines +29 to +36
- name: Checkout repository
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 1

- name: Run Claude Code Review
id: claude-review
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔒 Security & Privacy | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

printf '\n## Workflow files\n'
git ls-files .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml .github/workflows/claude.yml

printf '\n## Relevant lines\n'
for f in .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml .github/workflows/claude.yml; do
  echo "---- $f ----"
  cat -n "$f" | sed -n '1,120p'
done

printf '\n## Search for other action pins in workflows\n'
rg -n 'uses:\s*[^@]+@' .github/workflows -g '*.yml' -g '*.yaml'

Repository: ophi-dev/antlr-rust-runtime

Length of output: 7088


Pin these workflow actions to immutable SHAs.
Both Claude jobs still reference mutable tags in privileged contexts:

  • .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml: actions/checkout@v4, anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
  • .github/workflows/claude.yml: actions/checkout@v4, anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
🧰 Tools
🪛 zizmor (1.26.1)

[warning] 29-32: credential persistence through GitHub Actions artifacts (artipacked): does not set persist-credentials: false

(artipacked)


[error] 30-30: unpinned action reference (unpinned-uses): action is not pinned to a hash (required by blanket policy)

(unpinned-uses)


[error] 36-36: unpinned action reference (unpinned-uses): action is not pinned to a hash (required by blanket policy)

(unpinned-uses)

📍 Affects 2 files
  • .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml#L29-L36 (this comment)
  • .github/workflows/claude.yml#L28-L35
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml around lines 29 - 36, Pin the
actions/checkout and anthropics/claude-code-action references to immutable
commit SHAs in both .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml lines 29-36 and
.github/workflows/claude.yml lines 28-35, replacing the mutable v4 and v1 tags
while preserving the existing action configuration.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

Comment on lines +36 to +41
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:
claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}
plugin_marketplaces: 'https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code.git'
plugins: 'code-review@claude-code-plugins'
prompt: '/code-review:code-review ${{ github.repository }}/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

echo "== workflow =="
sed -n '1,120p' .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml

echo
echo "== repo references =="
rg -n --hidden --glob '!**/.git/**' --glob '!**/node_modules/**' "code-review|claude_args|--comment|plugin_marketplaces|plugins:" .github/workflows . || true

Repository: ophi-dev/antlr-rust-runtime

Length of output: 2890


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

wc -l .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml
printf '\n'
cat -n .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml | sed -n '1,120p'

Repository: ophi-dev/antlr-rust-runtime

Length of output: 1951


🌐 Web query:

Anthropic claude-code code-review README --comment claude_args inline-comment GitHub CLI tools

💡 Result:

Claude Code provides a dedicated /code-review command designed to analyze diffs for correctness bugs, style issues, and efficiency improvements [1][2][3]. When using this command, the --comment flag is specifically used to post findings as inline comments directly on a GitHub Pull Request [1][2]. Usage and Integration: - Local Execution: The /code-review command is run within a Claude Code terminal session [1][3]. It automatically detects the open GitHub pull request associated with your current branch, provided the GitHub CLI (gh) is installed [2]. - Command Syntax: To run a review and post findings as inline comments, use: /code-review --comment [2][4] - Modifiers: You can specify effort levels (e.g., /code-review high --comment) to control the depth of the analysis [2][3]. - Alternative (GitHub App/Actions): For team-wide automation, you can use the managed Claude GitHub App (via Anthropic's organization settings) to trigger reviews on PR events (creation, push, or manual comment), or use the anthropics/claude-code-action in self-hosted GitHub Actions workflows to achieve similar inline feedback [1][3]. The --comment flag effectively bridges the local CLI environment with GitHub's code review interface, allowing for seamless integration into development workflows without leaving the terminal [2][3].

Citations:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

sed -n '1,120p' .github/workflows/claude.yml

Repository: ophi-dev/antlr-rust-runtime

Length of output: 2051


Run /code-review in comment mode
Add --comment to the prompt and pass the GitHub CLI/inline-comment tools through claude_args; otherwise this step only prints to the terminal instead of posting PR review comments.

🧰 Tools
🪛 zizmor (1.26.1)

[error] 36-36: unpinned action reference (unpinned-uses): action is not pinned to a hash (required by blanket policy)

(unpinned-uses)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml around lines 36 - 41, Update the
Claude Code action configuration to append --comment to the prompt and configure
claude_args to pass the GitHub CLI and inline-comment tools, ensuring the
code-review command posts review comments on the pull request instead of only
printing output.

Comment on lines +8 to +19
issues:
types: [opened, assigned]
pull_request_review:
types: [submitted]

jobs:
claude:
if: |
(github.event_name == 'issue_comment' && contains(github.event.comment.body, '@claude')) ||
(github.event_name == 'pull_request_review_comment' && contains(github.event.comment.body, '@claude')) ||
(github.event_name == 'pull_request_review' && contains(github.event.review.body, '@claude')) ||
(github.event_name == 'issues' && (contains(github.event.issue.body, '@claude') || contains(github.event.issue.title, '@claude')))

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀 Performance & Scalability | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

# Inspect the workflow around the referenced lines.
git ls-files .github/workflows/claude.yml
wc -l .github/workflows/claude.yml
cat -n .github/workflows/claude.yml | sed -n '1,220p'

Repository: ophi-dev/antlr-rust-runtime

Length of output: 2462


Remove the assigned issue trigger.
issues.assigned re-runs this workflow whenever the issue still contains @claude, so unrelated reassignment can invoke Claude again. Keep it only if assignment is meant to trigger Claude and is gated to the configured assignee.

🧰 Tools
🪛 zizmor (1.26.1)

[info] 14-14: workflow or action definition without a name (anonymous-definition): this job

(anonymous-definition)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.github/workflows/claude.yml around lines 8 - 19, Remove assigned from the
issues.types list in the workflow trigger, leaving only opened so unrelated
issue reassignment cannot rerun the claude job. Do not change the existing job
conditions or other event triggers.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9e47ecb134

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}
plugin_marketplaces: 'https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code.git'
plugins: 'code-review@claude-code-plugins'
prompt: '/code-review:code-review ${{ github.repository }}/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Add --comment to publish review results

With this prompt, the automatic pull_request workflow invokes the code-review plugin without --comment; the upstream command instructions say the plugin stops after printing the terminal summary when that flag is absent, so each PR review can consume a Claude run and finish without posting any PR summary or inline comments. Add --comment to the slash command so the workflow actually publishes review feedback.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

id: claude-review
uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
with:
claude_code_oauth_token: ${{ secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN }}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Skip forked PRs before reading Claude secrets

For pull_request runs opened from forks, GitHub does not pass repository secrets other than GITHUB_TOKEN, so secrets.CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN is empty and this action has no Claude authentication to use. Because the workflow has no fork guard, external contributor PRs will get a failed Claude Code Review check instead of a skipped review; add an if that excludes forked heads or switch to a carefully scoped pull_request_target pattern.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants