Skip to content

qblox backend: configuration update for QCM#292

Open
RJQblox wants to merge 1 commit intooqc-community:mainfrom
RJQblox:main
Open

qblox backend: configuration update for QCM#292
RJQblox wants to merge 1 commit intooqc-community:mainfrom
RJQblox:main

Conversation

@RJQblox
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@RJQblox RJQblox commented Nov 18, 2025

This fix is needed since the NCO propagation delay is only available for readout modules (QRM), but not control modules (QCM). Both the src/qat/backend/qblox and src/purr/cat/backends/qblox folder have been updated, is this correct?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown


Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.


I have read the Contributor License Agreement and I hereby accept the Terms.


You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@helmaazouz-oqc helmaazouz-oqc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @RJQblox for the suggested changes ! When it comes to configuration, QBlox have fine-grained APIs for numerous settings, we've grouped NCO related ones exactly to avoid fine-grained methods. But you still have several subtypes of QBloxConfigHelper for the purposes you mentioned, I encourage you to override nco there with the sequence of changes you like (excluding prop delay)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants