Skip to content

Jenkins failing behat - #26624

Closed
DeepDiver1975 wants to merge 4 commits into
stable9from
jenkins-failing-behat
Closed

Jenkins failing behat#26624
DeepDiver1975 wants to merge 4 commits into
stable9from
jenkins-failing-behat

Conversation

@DeepDiver1975

@DeepDiver1975 DeepDiver1975 commented Nov 14, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Let jenkins fail if behat has issues ....

Related Issue

#26614 (comment)

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

@mention-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DeepDiver1975, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @SergioBertolinSG, @nickvergessen and @LukasReschke to be potential reviewers.

Vincent Petry and others added 4 commits November 14, 2016 13:43
@PVince81

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

afaik this was your research PR, the real PR is #26626 and was merged. Closing.

@PVince81 PVince81 closed this Nov 14, 2016
@PVince81
PVince81 deleted the jenkins-failing-behat branch November 14, 2016 17:51
@lock

lock Bot commented Aug 4, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock Bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 4, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants