Skip to content

[stable9.1] Fix cross storage move info#28238

Merged
PVince81 merged 4 commits into
stable9.1from
stable9.1-cross-storage-moveinfo
Jun 28, 2017
Merged

[stable9.1] Fix cross storage move info#28238
PVince81 merged 4 commits into
stable9.1from
stable9.1-cross-storage-moveinfo

Conversation

@PVince81

@PVince81 PVince81 commented Jun 27, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport of #28022 to stable9.1.

However this does not work. The integration test will fail.
I also tested this manually and it still produces broken entries.

So the fix itself might need to be slightly different for stable9.1.

Edit: Works now, required an additional backport

Vincent Petry and others added 3 commits June 27, 2017 18:31
Need to properly resolve the given path to a source path in
`getMoveInfo`. This was missing when adding this new method.
@PVince81

PVince81 commented Jun 27, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

The CacheWrapper will properly forward the call to the wrapped cache.
@PVince81

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Retested:

@jvillafanez please review, beware of the extra commit for the #27172 backport.

Again, this is only the PR that prevents the issue. I'll also want to backport the other PR that makes files scan fix the fallout.

@jvillafanez

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Changes make sense 👍

Any reason why #27172 wasn't backported before?

@PVince81

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jvillafanez I think it's because it only fixed a theoretical issue, a unit test that only existed on that branch. Now we can see why that backport is actually needed.

@lock

lock Bot commented Aug 3, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock Bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 3, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants