Skip to content

Backport #1872#3893

Merged
bartv2 merged 2 commits into
stable5from
backport_1872
Jul 8, 2013
Merged

Backport #1872#3893
bartv2 merged 2 commits into
stable5from
backport_1872

Conversation

@bartv2

@bartv2 bartv2 commented Jun 28, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Backport #1872, also fixes #3048

@herbrechtsmeier @karlitschek

This patch enables the use of forcessl together with a multiple domains
reverse SSL proxy (#1099) which have different hostname
and webroot for http and https access. The code assumes that the ssl
proxy (https) hostname and webroot is configured via overwritehost and
overwritewebroot.
The not equal comparison (<>) of a variable with an empty string
could lead to false positive results as the compare do not check
the type and thereby could not make sure that the checked variable
is a string. The usage of the not identical comparison operator
(!==) make sure that the variable is a string and not empty.
@herbrechtsmeier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I use the patches together with the current release. Please merge the patches as they fix #3048.

@bartv2 The issue number looks wrong.

@bartv2

bartv2 commented Jul 2, 2013

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yep, updated number

@herbrechtsmeier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What is missing to merge this pull request?

@karlitschek

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👍

@MorrisJobke

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Code looks good, but I can't test this, because I haven't such an setup. From me a 👍 because it's approved in the original PR (to master branch)

bartv2 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2013
@bartv2
bartv2 merged commit 3649137 into stable5 Jul 8, 2013
@bartv2
bartv2 deleted the backport_1872 branch July 8, 2013 18:28
@lock lock Bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 26, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants